Baze v. Rees

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Baze v. Rees
Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 7, 2008
Decided April 16, 2008
Full case name
Ralph Baze and Thomas C. Bowling v. John D. Rees
Docket nos. 07-5439
Citations 553 U.S. ___; 2008 WL 1733259
Prior history Writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky
Argument Oral argument
Holding
Lethal injection is constitutional under the Eighth Amendment.
Court membership
Case opinions
Plurality Roberts, joined by Kennedy and Alito
Concurrence Alito
Concurrence Stevens
Concurrence Thomas, joined by Scalia
Concurrence Breyer
Dissent Ginsburg, joined by Souter
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. VIII

Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. ___ (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case. The court agreed to hear the appeal of two men, Ralph Baze and Thomas Bowling, who were sentenced to death in Kentucky. The men argue that executing them by lethal injection would violate the 8th Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Under court precedent, lethal injection must not inflict "unnecessary pain". The men's attorneys argue that the chemicals used to kill them carried an unnecessary risk of inflicting pain during the process. The specific "cocktail" used for lethal injections in Kentucky is the same that virtually all states use for lethal injection, so this case has nationwide implications. An effective moratorium on executions in the United States had taken place since certiorari was granted in this case. [1]

The Court heard oral arguments on January 7, 2008. On April 16, the Court rejected the challenge thereby upholding Kentucky's method of lethal injection by a vote of 7-2. Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter dissented.[2]

Contents

[edit] Bibliography

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Languages