File talk:NASA budget linegraph BH.PNG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Would you be willing to regenerate this image? There are multiple inflation rates, so saying "Then" and "1996" dollars is inaccurate. It would be best to have "Then", "CPI", "GDP Deflator", and "NNSI". The NNSI (NASA New Start Index) is the one that really matters, as it indicates NASA's true buying power. -- Rei 21:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know where such statistics can be found? If so i will create an updated graph. Markcoulter50 (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there's this -- 128.255.251.167 (talk) 00:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

add second scale for CPI[edit]

If someone decides to update the image, try displaying CPI on a second scale - at the moment, the dramatic increase since 1958 is hardly visible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.2.3.102 (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

scale for CPI?[edit]

The CPI is on a different scale, and it should be about 10x larger for visibility - however it may be redundant - if it only serves to document the source of the difference between the other two lines, then it might be better to remove it outright. Scaling it up would make its shape clearer, but may tend to obscure the primary information in the graph. 184.147.227.237 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]