This file is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
I noticed that the Start screen is mostly made up of non-copyrightable elements (simple geometrical shapes). The only exceptions I see are the background image and the images used on some of the app tiles. We can replace the background and apps with a blank background and apps that show free content on their tiles, so I don't believe this image meets NFCC criterion #1 ("no free equivalent.") I know we tend to prefer screenshots that show the software's default configuration, but of course Wikipedia's copyright policy overrules any preference we may have. - Josh (talk | contribs) 23:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I love your concern, but no, it cannot be done. A single geometric shape is not eligible for copyright protection but that does not mean an entire work composed of them is not eligible either. Besides, you need a whole fleet of tiles under free content license that can expand to Metro-style app size, which I am afraid are non-existent. (I repeat: free genuine tiles are non-existent; not rare, but non-existent.) Photoshopping free logos onto tiles is another way but that's forgery. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like Wikimedia Commons is already allowing a file with the Start screen less it content. As for the claim that no apps display free content...Photos and Desktop only display pictures that I choose. Many apps display only text. I'm not saying it'd be easy. Even if we can't do away with copyrighted content altogether aren't we supposed to use as little as possible? - Josh (talk | contribs) 17:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said: fake. And "claim that no apps display free content"? I did not say such a thing. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 17:24, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If their content were free, surely they would be existent "free genuine tiles" in the sense relevant to this discussion? - Josh (talk | contribs) 17:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Yes, if you could find tiles from apps that show free contents, yes. Still, I expect the composed work issue is not easily fixable. Even after a lot of work, the end result would be poor and most people would probably argue that free contents cannot adequately replace non-free yet. (I among them.) Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
