Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation
Cover of the first edition
AuthorGilles Deleuze
Original titleFrancis Bacon: Logique de la sensation
TranslatorDaniel W. Smith
CountryFrance
LanguageFrench
SubjectFrancis Bacon
Published
  • 1981 (Editions de la Difference, in French)
  • 2003 (Continuum, in English)
Media typePrint
Pages209 pages (Continuum edition, 2003)
ISBN978-0816643424

Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation (French: Francis Bacon: Logique de la sensation) is a 1981 book by philosopher Gilles Deleuze, analyzing the work of twentieth-century British figurative painter Francis Bacon. In this biography, Deleuze discusses aesthetics, objects of perception ('percepts'), and sensation.[1]

While The Logic of Sensation is sometimes viewed as a work of art history, Deleuze's wrote that the primary motivation for creating the work was to explore the philosophy of art. He also sought to explore the conceptualization of art beyond the representation of an image. The text was translated into English by Daniel W. Smith in 2003.[2]

Summary[edit]

Deleuze states that Bacon's art, with its bodies as figures, and spaces as "round areas," exists in the zone of indiscernibility, a parallel to the plane of immanence that artistically follows lines of flight in "the act of fleeing or eluding."[3] However, the book is intended to be built on a slow intensification of its titular viewpoint, "a general logic of sensation," which progresses gradually in complexity.[4] Deleuze's concept of becoming, which he had explored in detail a year earlier with Félix Guattari in A Thousand Plateaus (1980), is the theoretical foundation for his interpretation of Francis Bacon's art.

Deleuze's concept of art goes beyond the representation of an image. According to Ronald Bogue in "Gilles Deleuze: The Aesthetics of Force", Deleuze emphasizes a common problem across various art forms. He focuses not on reproducing or inventing different forms of representation in art, but on "harnessing forces."[5]

In an earlier work, The Logic of Sense (1969), Deleuze explored a comprehensive logic of sensation in response to Bacon's provocative use of smearing, detachment, and the destruction of signifiers about bodies, contemporary myths, and portraiture. Here, Deleuze remarks in the final preface of Francis Bacon that Bacon's art is "of a very special violence."[4]: x  In saying this, he analyses the content of Bacon's paintings set on fields of color with little visual depth that make "use of spectacles of horror, crucifixions, prostheses and mutilations, monsters."[6]

Deleuze attempts to understand the wider literary and semiotic context of Bacon's art through employing the rhizomatic, or nonlinear mode of analysis, which he and psychoanalyst Félix Guattari had popularized in their work A Thousand Plateaus published one year before. This form of analysis seeks to disentangle the socio-cultural roots of a given subject, through the use of a dialectical comparison. For Bacon's art, Deleuze makes prominent use of Samuel Beckett's novella "The Lost Ones" (1966–1970) as one of his main literary examples.[7]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Thacker, Eugene (2004). "Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation (review)". Leonardo. 37 (5): 417–418. ISSN 1530-9282.
  2. ^ Deleuze, Gilles (2003). Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. United States: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 9780816643417.
  3. ^ Brian Massumi, "Notes on the Translation and Acknowledgments" to Deleuze and Guattari (1980, xvi)
  4. ^ a b Deleuze, Gilles. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. Continuum Press.
  5. ^ Bogue, Ronald (1 January 1993). "Gilles Deleuze: The Aesthetics of force". Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. p. 56. Archived from the original on 5 November 2015. Retrieved 23 September 2023.
  6. ^ bloomsbury.com. "The Logic of Gilles Deleuze". Bloomsbury. Retrieved 2024-01-22.
  7. ^ Fifield, Peter (September 2009). "Gaping Mouths and Bulging Bodies: Beckett and Francis Bacon". Journal of Beckett Studies. 18 (1–2): 57–71. doi:10.3366/E0309520709000272. ISSN 0309-5207.

Further reading[edit]