Talk:1988 Women's Cricket World Cup final/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, will take a look through in detail tomorrow. Harrias talk 20:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Background[edit]

  • "England had won the first world cup" - World Cup
  • "Australia had beaten England" - defeated
  • Wikilink wickets to the relevant article

Route to the final[edit]

  • "once against Australia and once against New Zealand." - possible minor rewrite to avoid repetition of the same phrase?
  • "Ireland and the Netherlands were well adrift," - behind

Summary[edit]

  • "in Melbourne, Australia on 18 December." - comma after Australia please
  • "Heather Smith, of The Sydney Morning Herald suggested that," - the first comma isn't needed I think
  • Wikilink the first mention of the term "crease" to the relevant article and the same for the terms "delivery" and "over"
  • "earning praise from both The Sydney Morning Herald and The Times,[9][6]" - refs in numerical order
  • The MOS specifically states this is not necessary: "References need not be moved solely to maintain the chronological order of footnotes as they appear in the article..". Harrias talk 20:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's a part of the MOS that I don't agree with but it's no deal breaker MWright96 (talk) 08:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and in the fourteenth over," - 14th

Aftermath[edit]

  • Both mentions of "world cup" should be spelt as "World Cup"
@MWright96: Other than the point I responded to last night, all have been changed as suggested. Thanks for the review. Harrias talk 08:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]