Talk:FN 5.7×28mm/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Variations section - List time of service for all bullets listed unless already noted. Some section have them introduced while one has them discontinued. Are some of these variations still in use? If so, state it.
- SS190 duty subsection
In the first sentence of the second paragraph, when did the Houston Police Department test these bullets?
- Non-FN ammunition, use {{Convert}} for the 0.224" bullet for the mm showing listed in the first sentence of the second paragraph. For the last sentence of the second paragraph, define twist rate for those who non-firearms readers.
Specifications section
- Define P90 muzzle velocity, P90 muzzle energy, Bullet type, and Effective range listed in the first column of the table.
Controversey section
- In the first sentence of the lead paragraph, when did the controversey for the civilian shooters take for the 5.7x28 mm first take place? For the second sentence of the lead paragraph, when did the Brady Campaign make claim on the SS192 testing? Also WP:WEASEL on Brady Campaign "claimed".
- In the lead sentence of the second paragraph, spell out Five-seven as FN Five-Seven. Also, when were the 5.7x28mm subject to the controversey? Specify?

For all sources, list the publisher in italics. See WP:MOS on italics for more information.
Reference #2, put (in French) in sourcing since this is written in the French language.
Link not confirmed in Reference #36.
Reference #39 is the same as Reference #8. Merge.
Reference #40 is the same as Reference #15. Merge.
Reference #42 only shows an image instead of a print. Why is an image being used as a reference?

Reviewer: Chris (talk) 13:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]