Talk:American Fuzzy Lop (software)

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Google

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

On 2 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to American fuzzy lop. The result of the discussion was moved to American Fuzzy Lop (software).

Does this article still rely too much on primary sources?[edit]

Dear @Widefox: you added a "primary source" template in 2016 (see this edit). Could you be so kind as to follow-up five years later with another review of this page to see if the template you added is still relevant? Thanks Jamplevia (talk) 05:57, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing looks weak still - mainly primaries (CVEs, sourcecode, blogs by the creator - arguably authoritative enough to qualify as WP:RS but still primary). Also, a dead URL [1], and since then another editor has added an "advert" tag which may just be the overuse of primaries without being based on quality secondaries. I believe we give more leeway to open source, so I'd say it's borderline now. But no, I think it could still do with improving. Widefox; talk 21:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Jamplevia (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've added secondary sources to many of the statements in this article, and removed the "primary source" template. Feel free to reinstate it if it's still appropriate! siddharthist (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Splinemath: you added an "advert" template in 2019 (see this edit). Could you be so kind as to follow-up two years later another review of this page to see if the template you added is still relevant? Please also see this discussion thread. Thanks Jamplevia (talk) 22:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Thanks. -Splinemath (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change title[edit]

The title is not capitalized and I cant change it. ScienceFan66 (talk) 23:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not capitalized either on github; I'd say it's probably intentional and the first letter is only capitalized because it's a Noun. Wei gur de 14:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The lowercase thing is a stylization. And if that were the correct capitalization, technical reasons prohibit article titles from beginning with a lowercase letter, so WP:DISPLAYTITLE would have been used. But again, this isn't the case here. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 November 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to American Fuzzy Lop (software). (closed by non-admin page mover) — Material Works 18:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American fuzzy lop (fuzzer) → American fuzzy lop – WP:SMALLDETAILS. The use of uppercase vs. lowercase, aided by hatnotes, is sufficient to disambiguate between the rabbit breed and the software fuzzer. Both articles have similar pageview numbers, so neither is a primary topic over the other. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; instead move to American Fuzzy Lop (software) as a proper noun per MOS:NCCAPS / MOS:CAPS / MOS:TM / WP:TITLETM: First of all, this is a proper name, since it is the name of one specific software package, so it should ordinarily be capitalized as "American Fuzzy Lop", and I see that some cited sources do capitalize the phrase. Second, we have no way of knowing that people looking for the breed of rabbit will not use lowercase when looking for it. The uppercase for the breed name may be a Wikipedia convention, but readers cannot be expected to be intimately familiar with Wikipedia capitalization conventions. Moreover, WP:DAB suggests using more general rather than more specific disambiguation terms. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I'm not buying the WP:DIFFCAPS argument for this one. 162 etc. (talk) 00:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
American Fuzzy Lop (software) is way better. It was capped thus by its author in this original whitepaper (cited in the article). Dicklyon (talk) 01:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American Fuzzy Lop (software) The software name is inherently a proper name. It has nothing to do with rabbits. Invoking MOS:TM would require us to demonstrate that the lowercase predominates. It is hard enough to get search results for the term, let alone to distinguish capitalisation (see search here) American fuzzy lop is already a redirect to the rabbit. Basing disambiguation on capitalisation is rarely a good option. It assumes precognition by readers that the capitalisation creates a distinction - ie they need to be reasonably familiar with both topics to recognise such a distinction. The two topics here are relatively niche and such precognition cannot be reasonably assumed. As a disambiguation term, software is much more recognisable than fuzzer. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.