Talk:An Event in Autumn

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Peer Review[edit]

Whose work are you reviewing?

Ollie, Jai, and Ty's Group

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:Tuptastic/An Event In Autumn

Thoughts:

Placement and content of infobox was correct and thorough. Most of everything in the lead referenced a different section later on. The only one I noticed that didn't was for adaptation, so maybe adding a sentence about that could help. I would suggest adding more to the article, but after looking at other wikipedia articles of books within the series, the draft is similar in length. I appreciate the references to other Wikipedia links about the subject, and I like how everything was paraphrased concisely. I didn't notice any grammar mistakes.

Sobunbunso (talk) 18:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chloe's Peer Review[edit]

Lead

The lead is concise, but there is some information in the lead that does not appear elsewhere in the article, "twelfth installation in the Inspector Wallander series" and the 2014 English publisher was Vintage Books. This general information could be added into the infobox.

Content

The content is concise and informative. Is there a historical/social event that could be added? The effect of World War II on travelers that did not make it home? Though after viewing the other linked articles in the series this suggestion may be a stretch.

Tone

Neutral and informative

Sources

The sources seem to support the information in the article, even if there is not much to be found.

Organization

I think the organization is great, and I like how the infobox fills up all of the space beside the sections.

Thoughts: As far as the new article requirements about notability, I don't think that is achievable with this article due to a lack of information available. I did not notice any grammar mistakes or any odd wording, and the tone was great. Crd6f (talk) 01:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren's Peer Review[edit]

Lead

The lead is thorough and contains useful information. Links are easy to follow. I would place the word "by" in the third sentence "It was translated by into English Laurie Thompson" after the word English so it reads more smoothly. Also, I think you could remove the comma in that sentence, but I could be wrong. These are minor adjustments. Overall well done.

Synopsis

Summary is well-written and provides the reader a good understanding of the plot. If your sources allow, I think that the character sub-section will be a great addition to tie things together nicely.

Overall, the article is organized well and aesthetically pleasing. The infobox is nice, and I like the table at the bottom of the page. I will say that the overall notability of the article appears limited, but the important information seems to be there. Unreal1122 (talk) 02:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]