Talk:Middle of the market

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Boeing 757 was copied or moved into Middle of the market with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

creation reason[edit]

This article was created after being discussed in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation#Middle_of_the_market. Its goal is to remove the noise about the projects to occupy this market segment which was polluting close aircraft articles (e.g. B757, B737MAX, A321LR). --Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

merge from Boeing 797[edit]

As there isn't any new Boeing 797 yet, its naming is speculative : it was used by Steven Udvar-Hazy at the ISTAT conference, and is the next logical Boeing name, but isn't launched yet. The 797 article could easily be a part of the New midsize airplane section, and thus eliminate redundancies by centralising information and limiting noise in close articles, as discussed for its creation. --Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The article can easily be recreated once Boeing officially launches the project, and moved to whatever name they launch it as, assuming it's not 797 at first. - BilCat (talk) 06:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As it was proposed since a month without opposition, I've done with referenced material moved here, see its history for process details.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

article biassed and outdated[edit]

The burgeoning order book for the Airbus A321 / 321LR / 321XLR shows that while Airbus is meeting this market, Boeing does not have anything available to compete, though once certified, the Boeing 737MAX10 will be a contender (though no long range version is built or planned. I would update the article, as many sources are available for reference, but as this article is written as if Boeing covers the sector (with the MAX9, no less??!!??) and Airbus doesn't, I can see that any changes I make would be quickly vandalised by the page's "owner". But someone should: it's seriously outdated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.143.142 (talk) 09:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]