Talk:Charles Baillie-Hamilton (Bath MP)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 8 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Charles Baillie-Hamilton (Bath MP). Other guy stays where he is. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vaticidalprophet 17:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– The current disambiguation is ambiguous, as both appear to have been Conservative Party politicians. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 18:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, c, l) 04:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, but would support Charles Baillie-Hamilton (Conservative politician) → Charles Baillie-Hamilton (Bath MP). The other nominated main title header, Charles Baillie-Hamilton (Aylesbury MP), should remain as is. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st as a move somewhere since although this one gets more views (28) than the other (11)[[1]] this isn't likely enough for a PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as proposed. Support moving this one to Charles Baillie-Hamilton (Bath MP) and leaving the other one. This is the usual disambiguator for British politicians of the same party. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.