Talk:Digvijaysinh Jhala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Digvijaysinhji Jhala)

Requested move 4 April 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Unopposed move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Digvijaysinhji JhalaDigvijaysinh Jhala – Sources give conflicting spellings. Only one RS - TOI - uses the spelling Jhala (giving the first name as Digvijaysinh), and only one RS - The Indian Express - uses the spelling "Digvijaysinhji" (giving the surname as Zala), and I think the "-ji" bit can safely be omitted, as it's just a respectful suffix added to names, like "-san" in Japanese. The guy has just died, and obituaries from many websites - Livemint, Business Standard, Economic Times use the spelling Digvijaysinh Zala. That also appears to be the common name used - by politicians on Twitter, at least - while condoning his death. For now, I've temporarily created the page Digvijaysinh Zala as a redirect to this one. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 10:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the target page title was Digvijaysinh Zala before being altered per the nom's note below. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 04:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: On re-reading the three obituaries with Digvijaysinh Zala mentioned above, I realised that they're all from the same syndicated feed - ANI's. As for other sources, WaPo and LA Times repeated TOI's spelling: Digvijaysinh Jhala. The Indian Express also used Digvijaysinh Jhala, in an independently written obituary. So I guess the move should instead be to Digvijaysinh Jhala, omitting the "-ji" per my reasoning above. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 03:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Need more sources[edit]

I added the BLP source maintenance template as there seems to be a lot of unsourced text on the page. There doesn't seem to be much on him on the web either. Probably will have to remove the unsourced material at a later stage. -Sitaphul (talk) 04:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]