Talk:eCos

Untitled[edit]

", however, some of the additional features have not been released as free software."

What do you mean HOWEVER? Is there something negative about it? I think not.

This sentence doesn't seem to be NPOV, without a source: "It can be customized to precise application requirements, with hundreds of options, delivering the best possible run-time performance and minimized hardware needs." I can change it if no one objects. Decoder24 (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody objects. The sentence was most definitely not NPOV. Said: Rursus ☻ 21:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

eCos kernel in itself is mainly written in C++, though big parts of eCos are written in C. Some architecture-specific parts are in assembly.

--84.14.8.82 (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

32 or 64 bit?[edit]

The description does not mention if there exists at this time a 64 bit version of ECOS. If not, are there any issues running ECOS on a 64 bit machine? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.222.37.57 (talk) 15:30, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ECos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]