This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
@Ponyo: I said there were no references because citing only a primary source might be as bad as having no source at all. ha! Thank you for being an active admin Ral 33 (talk) 00:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ral33: A self-published primary source is perfectly legitimate when used by an entity to verify non-controversial information about itself (WP:SELFPUB). The article is woefully lacking in secondary reliable sources, but it is not wholly unsourced per se.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo: Gotcha. I just think the more references the better! Thank you Ral 33 (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And to the IP that restored the incorrect template, I have again corrected it according to the very clear instructions for its usage at the template documentation page including the edit notice box that states "Don't add this template to articles that contain even one general reference, parenthetical reference, or citation-containing footnote. A citation is any description of a reliable source that supports any of the article content, even a bare URL. The format of the citation and the name of the section heading are not what determines whether a link or citation is a source". --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@NotTheFakeJTP:, per the template instructions noted above, please don't add the "unreferenced" template to articles that include sources that verify any of the content in the article. There is no requirement that a source be included in a "references" section to be considered a source.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
