Talk:Gliese 581c/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Davidbuddy9 Talk 04:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
Pass
The lead paragraph is a nice read and it definitely seems to be polished.

The sub-section Mass (under Physical characteristics) says clarification needed. But I don't see how this could be clarified more the sentence makes sense and is understandable already. So remove the clarification needed tag.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
Under Liquid Water, add that citation from MOST used in the second last paragraph in Radius That justifies no transits.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
Recent edits have been mostly constructive so far of all edits made in 2016 to this article only 1 edit has been flagged as vandalism or testing but the edit itself didn't seem like vandalism altough the space between 581 and c should be there.:
It is illustrated by two images, all of which are WP:AIAO compliant.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: - Pass, polished lead, one citation that needs to be carried over and one tag needs to be removed.

I have made all the fixes needed in this edit. Davidbuddy9 Talk 04:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]