Talk:Gravitoelectromagnetism/to do

tasks for expert:

• rewrite more along lines of most recent Mashhroon review article,
• more NPOV,
• be careful to explain that GEM is not the same thing at all as "gravity shielding" or EM fields allegedly producing antigravity; politely stress that GEM is mainstream but these two topics tend toward crackpottery,
• write and link to background articles on "warp drives"; clarify relations to GEM alleged in current version,
• maybe a small caveat about mainstream modes of partial interconversion between gravitational and EM fields; explain why these are not useful for "gravity shielding" or "exotic spacecraft propulsion" schemes!
• title should really be gravitoelectromagnetism - done r b-j 05:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• distinguish carefully between weak-field, slowly moving test particle, and other assumptions,
• explain relatation with Bel decomposition (valid generally) and mention strong-field cosmological GEM type extension of Dunbar et al.
• distinguish between gtr and other theories