Talk:HARDtalk

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

On 23 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Talk:HARDTalk to HARDtalk. The result of the discussion was moved.

Jimmy Wales[edit]

I've taken the liberty of removing a reference to an interview of Jimmy Wales. While it's a significant event to Wikipedia, I don't think the interview constituted an important event in the life of the programme or in global terms.

Given the eminence of the people generally interviewed on that programme, I think we'd need unimpeachable grounds to include that particular reference rather than references to, for instance, interviews of Ali Osman Taha and Mikheil Saakashvili. --Tony Sidaway 02:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted this again, with reference to our self-references guideline (WP:SELF), in particular the section called "Articles are about their subjects". The fact that the HARDtalk interview with Jimmy Wales was highly significant to Wikipedia does not make it significant to HARDtalk itself. --Tony Sidaway 14:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, good call. You have it right and I have it wrong. Sorry. Astronaut (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 December 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Colonestarrice (talk) 09:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HARDTalk → HARDtalk – Shouldn't the page's title, and URL, be HARDtalk, not HARDTalk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.31.237 (talk) 17:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Jerm (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, since that's how the name is rendered on the BBC's website and elsewhere. I will request a move. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 18:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.