Talk:Intel system development kit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intel system development kit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

On 23 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Intel System Development Kit to Intel system development kit. The result of the discussion was moved.

The SDK-86 Price[edit]

The sentence "It was sold as a single board kit at a cheaper price than a single 8086 chip because Intel thought that the success of a microprocessor depends on its evaluation by as many users as possible" contradicts the later given price of $780. The MSRP of the 8086 was around $200. Meritous (talk) 20:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 July 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 18:51, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Intel System Development Kit → Intel system development kit – Moved to caps without discussion in 2010, the term "system development kit" is used generically here, for a wide class of products from Intel. It is far from consistently capped in sources, and when it is, it's usually either for explaining the SDK initialism or as part of a more specific product name. It should be reverted to lowercase here. Dicklyon (talk) 15:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This article is about a long series of Intel system development kits, not a single product named "Intel System Development Kit", so it's a generic common noun-phrase, not a proper name. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per nom. Primergrey (talk) 00:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per nom. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:00, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.