Talk:Itihasa-Purana

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Parenthesis[edit]

Might we put इतिहास in parenthesis or write 'itihāsa'? Khirad 07:36, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Put इतिहास, writing in Sanskrit and in Devanagari is better than Romanised letter! DaGizza 07:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence[edit]

Not sure about the sentence: "The occasional use of the term to refer to hindu scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gita, is entirely inappropriate." How can the Bhagavad Gita be denied categorization as itihasa when the Mahabharata, of which it is a part, is clearly categorized as such?

I dunno.... i don't find any difference between the two. Remember these were transmitted before the inventing of the script.

As for not classifying it as itihaasa, it means that it can be classified as a smriti as well

This is part of Hinduism , therefore its classification as part of Jainism is inappropriate, as is referred in the table on right.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Itihasa-Purana?[edit]

In Khandogya-Upanishad 7.1.4 (SBE vol. 1, p.110) is mentioned an "Itihasa-Upanishad". Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article (and is known, which Purana is meant, the Harivamsa or the Bhagavata)?--217.13.71.164 (talk) 12:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indian epic poetry article connection[edit]

I am not sure if the Itihasa / Indian epic poetry split is intentional, but currently

Itihasas and
Itihāsa

redirect here, while

redirect there.

Another problem is that (currently) this article immediately jumps to listing what itihasa consists of, without defining what it is first. —Mykhal (talk) 10:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's not my area and I don't know what is the best way to deal with these topics, but from reading the articles it seems that Indian epic poetry has a much broader scope: it subsumes not just the Itihasa but also other Sanskrit epic poetry (Mahakavya) as well as epic poetry in the traditions of other Indian languages. The whole topic area could do with some tidying up but I don't see the case for a merge. As for the redirects, that's well spotted! I'm going to redirect them all here. – Uanfala 09:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]