Talk:J. Paul Getty Museum

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as High-importance).

Museums

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

"The controversies with Italy and Greece," NPOV problems[edit]

This section appears to be in need of a cleanup, and a NPOV presentation of the Getty's position on the controversy & return of antiquities. Our article presently makes the Getty the Bad Guys, but IB the actual situation is more nuanced. --Pete Tillman (talk) 07:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. In fact, this article would benefit from more use of Felch & Frammolino's Chasing Aphrodite. That book, written by two investigative reporters who spent five years (2005-2010) on the activities of this museum, explains the origins of the museum (such as Getty's own art collection, which was selected more with an eye to bargains than to quality, resulting with a selection that was "largely mediocre art" -- p. 23); the pressures of US tax law which required them to spend on a regular basis tens of millions of dollars; snapshots of shady figures in the Classical art market, as well as examples of how specific pieces pass thru it; the changing ethics in museum acquisitions (the Getty wasn't the only one who bought looted art); & that Marion True was not the only one at Getty involved (her predecessor Jiri Frel makes her appear by contrast a saint). One could argue that the Getty bought so many pieces of questionable origin because these criminals were attracted to its bottomless funds for acquisitions, & that even with modern, more ethical standards, it was inevitable that they would have purchased pieces from questionable, if not illegal, sources. -- llywrch (talk) 17:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can it be NPOV? The Italian Procure are filled with papers that clearly depict the Museum as a plundering organization, second only to the British Museum.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on J. Paul Getty Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on J. Paul Getty Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150526082307/http://www.getty.edu/about/trust.html to http://www.getty.edu/about/trust.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Getty Museum, J. Paul" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Getty Museum, J. Paul and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 6#Getty Museum, J. Paul until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 01:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]