Talk:JAR (file format)

Java High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

I'm a little perturbed about the 'See Also' section of this article. It seems to me that the vendor is taking advantage of the free exposure provided by Wikipedia. Am I off base? If Wikipedia is commonly used as an advertising medium, doesn't it taint the entire work? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.152.12.67 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 2005 December 16.

I agree. It's not even related to the topic of the article except by using the same name. I removed it. Richard W.M. Jones 09:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.jad files[edit]

Mention is made of mobile, but no mention is made of .jad files. Mathiastck 21:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ordering of file types[edit]

Currently, OpenDocument, WAR, EAR, RAR. Googling OpenDocument doesn't even return that the format is a JAR, and indeed, OpenDocument files can certainly be a plain XML format. I'm bumping it down the list.

It looks like JCA uses RAR compression instead of ZIP? Dean 14:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed OpenDocument, as it has nothing to do with Java. They just happen to use the ZIP format, as do JARs. - Sikon 15:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 It also happens to have a META-INF directory, as do JARs, though the metadata in an .SXW file is META-INF/manifest.xml, not META-INF/MANIFEST. I have checked the headers and both Zip and JARs appear to share the same four bytes at the start:  50 4b 03 04 ; you can't determine type from that.

Problems with the JAR format[edit]

On 2 March, 2007, an unknown user made a paragraph deletion which began and ended in the middle of two unrelated sentences immediately preceeding and following the deleted paragraph. This caused the section to contain an erroneous sentence fragment. I am restoring the ending and beginning of those sentences. Moecazzell 14:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on JAR (file format). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130108105404/http://download.java.net/jdk8/docs/technotes/guides/jar/jar.html to http://download.java.net/jdk8/docs/technotes/guides/jar/jar.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]