This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
I challenged the assessment of the page as stub. It doesn't have a few lines. The article was expanded well. I want a reviewer to re-assess the page (at least I see a Start is preferred)? CSMention269 (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How can I do that? What is the process? CSMention269 (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It meets some of the conditions per Content Assessment:
1. Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
2. A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
3. Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
From Wikipedia:Content assessment: The quality assessments are mainly performed by Wikipedia editors, who tag talk pages of articles. As a Wikipedia editor you are able to re-assess the page. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Primefac. But for Good and Featured article or list, do we need to apply permission to elevate? CSMention269 (talk) 11:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GA and WP:FA describe those processes, which do involve specific criteria (see for example Wikipedia:Good article criteria). This article is not a GA candidate by any stretch at this point in time. I'm not sure what you mean by "non-reviewer"; Rater is not restricted to any specific user group. Primefac (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
