Talk:Karaoke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateKaraoke is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 23, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted

Technology Section[edit]

Hello,

I am new, but noticed that the 1st and 4th paragraphs of the technology section mention lower-quality machines that suppress vocal components of songs to make them singable. This seems to be a redundancy, but I am unsure how to solve it because there are so few citations. Best, DriftWrench2k (talk) 05:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

I don't get how the pronunciation can be "Ka-REE-Oke". It doesn't make any sense. It's a japanese word, that isn't pronounced that way in japanese. How can an a become an "ee"/"i"? KhlavKhalash (talk) 11:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's Kara o ke... Like Car Uh Okay — Preceding unsigned comment added by 240D:1A:8AF:4D00:5891:DD66:97DF:3162 (talk) 09:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because English-speakers who knew absolutely nothing about the Japanese language read the word "karaoke", and simplified it according to the conventions of their dialect and accent. I can attest that most Americans I've met would pronounce this "carry-oki", and would be unaware (or wouldn't care much) about the Japanese pronunciation kahra-okeh. Wikipedia doesn't set the rules, it relates what is commonly said in English. We do the same thing with words in other languages (i.e., Venice / Venezia, Florence / Firenze, Moscow / Moskva, etc.). Accrdong to the style guide, "If a common English rendering of the foreign name exists (Venice, Nikita Khrushchev), its pronunciation, if necessary, should be indicated before the foreign one." See WP:MOSPRON#Appropriate Use for guidance. - Boneyard90 (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not true that "100 yen in the 1970s was the price of two typical lunches"[edit]

I do not think that the claim "100 yen in the 1970s was the price of two typical lunches" is true.

In 1970, the conversion rate for the yen to dollars was 360 yen to 1 dollar. In 1970, the Consumer Price Index in Japan was 41% more than that of the United States. [1]

Doing a little math, a "lunch" in Japan in 1970 cost 50 yen. 50 yen is the US equivalent of (50/360 of $1) slightly more than 14 cents. Huh, lunch in Japan cost 14 cents in 1970?

Now, consider that the consumer price index shows prices in Japan were 41% more than the United States. Based on that, a "lunch" in the United States in 1970 would have cost 10 cents.

I don't think so; I was there, both in Japan and the United States in 1970 and the prices for lunch were never that cheap.

Based upon this inaccurate claim of the price for lunch in Japan, I will delete this phrase from the article.

Osomite (talk) 18:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Karaoke Week[edit]

After witnessing the popularity of karaoke rising, Scott and Michelle Shirai created National Karaoke Week, designating the fourth week each April to observe it. Scott taught a non-credit course in karaoke at the University of Hawaii from 1988 to 1999 during which time he and Michelle wrote and published "Karaoke: Sing Along Guide to Fun & Confidence." The first National Karaoke Week was an offshoot of that and observed April 20-26, 1997. It first appeared in Chase's Calendar of Events. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottyshirai (talkcontribs) 18:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Modern AI devocalisation[edit]

“ Recent years have seen the development of new techniques based on the fast Fourier transform. Although still not perfect, the results are usually much better than the old technique, because the stereo left-right comparison can be done on individual frequencies.”

This is the most recent advancement even mentioned. However, since the development of Spleeter, UVR, Demucs, and MDX AI based devocalisation, the technology has jumped to warp 9 in advancement. This needs to be updated, and terms like “recent” need to be specified instead, as time does, in fact, keep moving. 2601:1C2:5000:1472:35BB:8748:1837:EBB4 (talk) 17:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]