Talk:Ligna

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 4 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from LIGNA to Ligna. The result of the discussion was Moved.

Requested move 4 November 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus is that the title is not an acronym and that MOS:TM's guidance cuts against capitalizing this article subject's name. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LIGNA → Ligna – WP:TITLETM, MOS:ALLCAPS, MOS:TM. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. It's not an acronym. Dicklyon (talk) 00:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support clearly not an acronym nor is there any evidence that most sources use an allcaps stylization.--67.70.101.104 (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not an acronym. No evidence that it meets the threshold for allcaps per MOS:TM. Cinderella157 (talk) 05:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.