Talk:List of Intel processors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

80186[edit]

It should be noted here that despite everyone saying it was only available as embedded systems, there were still lots of desktop systems (like the siemens pc-d I have in my cellar). it was available with a 80187 fpu and a revolutionary bus system that allowed up to 127 extension cards.. if your case was big enough... and then later I got some 14mb hard drive... ah, those were the times... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.176.232.207 (talk) 19:11, September 10, 2006

"Built-in multitasking" ?[edit]

I removed this completely nonsensical statement. It was perhaps the intention that some reference be made to support for _virtual memory_, so it's fair to say "had built-in support for multitasking o/s's that require vm".

IXP?[edit]

Shouldn't the Intel IXP product line be listed?

Orphaned references in List of Intel processors[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of Intel processors's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "RCP" in group "lower-alpha":

  • From Coffee Lake: Price is Recommended Customer Price (RCP) at launch. RCP is the trade price that processors are sold by Intel to retailers and OEMs. Actual MSRP for consumers is higher
  • From Intel Core: Price reflects Recommended Customer Price (RCP) rather than MSRP. RCP is the cost per unit, in bulk sales of 1000 units or more, to OEMs, ODMs, and retail outlets when purchasing from Intel. Actual MSRP is higher than RCP

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT 18:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comprehensive list of Intel processors is fabulous resource; is not excessive detail[edit]

The Template to the Wikipedia page says the article may have excessive detail. I strongly disagree - this is a fabulous resource in listing most (ideally all) Intel x86 processors, along with detailed info on each (#P & E cores, multi-threading, power, package, etc.) Exactly what I was looking for and had partially created multiple times on my own before finding it. Note that it can be opened in Excel to automatically create a spreadsheet populated with the multiple tables. It is a fantastic resource. Don't reduce the detail. Don't replace it with a separate page for each generation. Thanks to those that created it!!! 24.143.251.106 (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]