Talk:Memory protection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

untitled[edit]

Cite on "first OS w/mem protection were variants of unix", kthx. Or: I roll to disbelieve.

I thinking of removing as the accuracy of this statement is somewhat questionable. Jatos 21:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Work on This article[edit]

Having read this article I think need todo some *major* work. Now, I know a lot about memory protection, as I have done a lot of research into memory protection, as I am looking into writing an OS.

Thinks I going to add 

- Information on a global and local descriptor tables on the x86 and x64 archs
- List of OSs that do and don't use memory protection (as requested by Demanator)

If anyone else is browsing and knows the subject I could do with some help. In particular, I would glad if someone could put information on non x86/Intel/AMD x64 arch's, and cite it! My knowledge is on the whole architecture specific.

Finally I have stubbed the article to draw attention. Jatos 21:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have added a section on OSs using memory protection. Section still needs work. I intend to add more details about what forms of memory protection different OSs use.

Boy, I think I have my work cut out on this article. Jatos 22:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Memory[edit]

Only the first paragraf of four under the heading "Paging" is about memory protection. The rest describes virtual memory and no matter how good introduction it is to virtual memory it doesnt help when you are reading about Memory protection.

I suggest removing the last three paragrafs and include only a reference to virtual memory. As for Segementing, IIRC its only a different kind of Virutal Memory and in this aspect working the same way as Paging. I'm not all certain in this case though. I belive that Hennessy, Patterson "Computer architecture. A quantitativ aproach" broach the subject in more detail but copy is unfortunatly not avaible right now. Patterson, Hennessy "Computer Organization & design 2nd Edition" only writes around one paragraf on the subject

Firstly, the four tildes would be useful, so people can tell you posted this comment

Virtual memory is in everyway relevant to memory protection, as it is an essential part of some memory protection implemention, most notable that of the x86 and Intel based 64bit architectures.

That said, I will be editing this article amongst other things to make this more clear.

Jatos 21:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The IBM 360 had memory protection without virtual memory. Peter Flass (talk) 23:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

O/S list with memory protecton[edit]

Can we please add this list to the article ? The type of memory protection for each would also be valuable info. StuRat 18:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to start seriously working on this article, as I have a lot of knowledge on the subject. I will add some information in this area.

Jatos 21:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

good[edit]

most helpful for what i was looking for :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Denmanator (talk • contribs) 09:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

true memory protection in home computer operating systems[edit]

This was available from the start with linux (arguably a home computer operating system) so that is well before 2001. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.167.46 (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And OS/2 in 1987. I'm changing the article. Memory protection on a home system was impossible until it had hardware support. Peter Flass (talk) 23:53, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protection keys[edit]

This mechanism was introduced in the System/360 architecture — Was this the first appearance? I don't know enough history to say.

and heavily used by System z operating systems — I guess this is unarguable. Not as heavily today as in earlier systems, since z/OS uses several different methods, but still used quite a bit.

Todays mainframes are essentially immune to hacker attacks. It is assumed, protection keys are a major contributor. — Is the first assertion true? Even if so, does the second follow? assumed by who? Peter Flass (talk) 12:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Memory protection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

India Education Program course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 19:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Memory_protection&oldid=1203969167"