Pegida Ireland was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 October 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pegida. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pegida article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
While there are citations to support the claim that the organisation is far-right (as there also are supported claims it is right-wing), in what way is far-right politics (and only far-right politics and not right-wing politics) a purpose of the group? I have seen no evidence to support the claim that the groups purpose is to spread far-right political ideas. To be clear, I'm not denying the possibility of the political position of the group, but questioning the authenticity of this being a 'purpose' of the organisation. Helper201 (talk) 00:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And here you are again trying to tendentiously sanitise the far-right by pushing for the edition of the cover all term right-wing to make the position "right-wing to far-right" which is not supported by sources and doesn't make logical sense as the far-right is right-wing, it is a tautology. Bacondrum (talk) 03:57, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not a personal attack. Bacondrum (talk) 04:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Try addressing the issue at hand. What you've written is pointless. All I was questioning here was how it could be reasoned that far-right politics is a purpose of the group. I called for no other changes. Helper201 (talk) 04:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are pushing for the catch all term on numerous European radical right pages in direct conflict with academic consensus and with very flimsy sourcing to back your claim. That definitely looks tendentious and it's worth commenting on. I invite you to participate in this rfc I've started on the term right-wing. Bacondrum (talk) 05:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The title describes Pegida as a Pan-European organization. However, I have never heard of a "-gida" branch outside Germany. Maybe "Pan-German" would be a more accurate wording? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horchatamivida (talk • contribs) 08:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
“Neo Nazi” really? The logo literally has A SWASTIKA BEING THROWN AWAY. And the leader was kicked out after posing as Hitler. It seems like this article was written by an American leftist with no idea what Pegida even is. 24.88.68.183 (talk) 16:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying not Neo-Nazi? That article says "Neo-Nazism comprises the post–World War II militant, social, and political movements that seek to revive and reinstate Nazi ideology." Anyway, this American restored neo-Nazi after it was removed. Doug Wellertalk 16:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
