Talk:Quantum network

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EdwardJS97, Branchkaleb. Peer reviewers: Gwen Leifer, Ghartfie.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Older comments[edit]

Should this article be merged with "Quantum cryptography"? In fact, it might make sense to just delete this article and have it redirect to Quantum cryptography because not much information is provided here that doesn't already exist on the other page. Qtipium (talk) 04:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i think it should be deleted as the description of what is going on is just wrong. The title "Quantum network" is also misleading. It is a straigtforward, garden variety fiber optic network without any spooky quantum entangled communication at all. Only the generation and verification of encryption keys makes use of entanglement. The transmission, i.e. the network, is standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.223.147 (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

end-to-end quantum channel?[edit]

the article does not explain if those networks prevent man-in-the-middle attacks (for example by the network operator), an if so, how this is achieved. --sofias. (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Man in the middle attacks would likely be impossible on quantum networks. The NSA hates this. If you disrupt the connecting atoms in any way, the messages change. Remember Schrodingers cat? I think the cat is still alive, but I can't tell unless I open the box to confirm its state Shtanto (talk) 18:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 update and rewrite[edit]

Hi folks, I wanted to expand upon this page as part of an advanced topics class I'm taking at UCLA. I hope this addresses some of the concerns that have been mentioned. I've tried to focus more on the implemented networks and less on cryptography as that's covered in the quantum crypo page as has been mentioned. For what it's worth, I think it would be beneficial to move some of the information from Quantum_key_distribution to this page and to BB84 and E91. I did most of the initial editing for this in my sandbox, but the history is kind of a mess.. Hope this helps! --Andy753421 (talk) 07:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]