Talk:Ron Jarvis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:R. G. Jarvis)

Requested move 26 February 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


R. G. JarvisRon Jarvis – The only cited source calls him Ron Jarvis, which is already a redirect to here. Dicklyon (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support WP:RECOGNIZABLE --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Looking at Google Books results there's not much in it "Ron Jarvis" 1660 results [1] versus "R. G. Jarvis" 1340 results [2] but the results for 'Ron Jarvis' look very random and don't necessarily relate to this topic. Zarcadia (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree there are not many sources for this guy; most of those are not, and the ones that are (of the R. G. Jarvis) are from paper citations, not representative of what he would be called in a context that's not so strongly styled toward initials. Dicklyon (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, it looks like "Ronald Jarvis" would be an even better choice, more common in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting comment. Needs more input about, especially with Ron v Ronald. Jenks24 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support "Ron Jarvis" per WP:COMMONNAME. It's used in the book written about him, which appears to be the best source available (and the only one cited here).--Cúchullain t/c 16:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.