Talk:Sanctuary season 1/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll make more copyedits as I go and jot queries below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

The main story arc taking place during the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal.. - sounds cumbersome, why not just " The main story arc of the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal"

who plot to control all abnormals --> "who seek to control all abnormals"

Fortunately, she exposes the imposter (the creature does not know Magnus hates coffee, a fact of which Will would be aware) and kills it --> "Fortunately" (POV) --> "However"

However, it soon completely takes her over - sounds a bit colloquial to me. a reword'd be good but nothing comes to mind straightaway.

Weathergirl Amy Saunders (Rekha Sharma) and cameraman Zach Pencer..... - it'd be good to note the different style of this episode, and how it is in newsreel footage and from the newsreporter's POV.

I have done addressed the issues, are there any others? -- Matthew RD 21:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Otherwise looking more polished and on target for GA pass. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: Sorry about the delay. Looking alright. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for the review. -- Matthew RD 12:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)