Talk:Soviet cruiser Krasny Krym/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 02:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
What references does the second link in the Links section have?
It wouldn't load for me, so I just deleted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Is there any more information about its post WWII service?
No, and that's what's annoying. Even Russian-language sources don't have squat about its post-war service.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 03:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that it's a thorough as it's ever going to be, I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 03:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]