Talk:Sturges's rule

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 April 2024 by reviewer Alpha3031 (talk · contribs).

Statistics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

On 24 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Sturges' Rule to Sturges's rule. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 24 April 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sturges' Rule → Sturges's rule – It is best to respect WP's style guidance, especially in article titles, when there's no compelling reason to do otherwise. Here both MOS:CAPS and MOS:POSS have been ignored by the last move of this title. Let's get it right. Dicklyon (talk) 19:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Primergrey (talk) 22:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the capitalization and possessive change. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 20:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The rule is universally called "Sturges' Rule", see any of the references in the article or Google. Changing it would make Wikipedia the only place it's written differently. Style guidance is just that, guidance, and shouldn't mean that the commonly used name of something is changed. WikiNukalito (talk) 08:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are exceptions to the way possessives are indicated (see MOS:POSS), so maybe this should be one, but Wikipedia is quite consistent in how it handles capitalization of rules etc. See MOS:IDEOLOGY, where it says:

Doctrines, ideologies, philosophies, theologies, theories, movements, methods, processes, systems or "schools" of thought and practice, and fields of academic study or professional practice are not capitalized, unless the name derives from a proper name.

So while the way Wikipedia capitalizes may put this rule out of step with the rest of the universe, it will be consistent with other rules on Wikipedia. (There are probably examples on Wikipedia which do not follow Wikipedia style, but other stuff exists is not a good argument. If you find other examples, let us know and we'll work on those too.) Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 19:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And here are over a hundred books that use "Sturges's". Dicklyon (talk) 21:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support— -s's is not ideal, but it's all we've got (-s' is worse). Downcase per our rules. Tony (talk) 06:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.