Talk:Technoculture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I note that the term has 3890 hits in Google Books. That's a very large number for Google Books and indicates that the term has gotten significant traction in academia. There are considerably more than the two universities cited that use the term in reference to study areas or degree programs. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Technoculture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?[edit]

I've deleted the photo of Bob Ostertag as he appears to be part of the Cinema and Digital Media dept of UC Davies, rather than a department relevant to this article which concerns the term as used to describe the impact of technology on society rather than on the arts. The term "notable" used in the photo to decribe him is also peacocking in the absence of any subtantiation. Substantiation of the claim is also missing on the wiki article on him (which has been flagged with multiple issues). I have also added a reference to a review of the book on the subject by Penley and Rose that the article refers to. LookingGlass (talk) 12:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]