Talk:TiVo Media File System

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past with the comment:
This article was deleted through the proposed deletion process. That deletion has been contested, and the article has been restored. Further attempts at deleting this article should be made through articles for deletion or the criteria for speedy deletion if the article meets any speedy deletion criteria except the recreation of deleted material criterion.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Here's MFS[edit]

Since there wasn't an article on Tivo MFS already, I wrote a stub article. Justification: an important FS, increasingly common, (millions of boxes), useful, and technically quite interesting.

What little I know comes from reading Dave Platt's old usenet posts, where he credits the MFS design to Jim Black, and notes that MFS doesn't pass its data through the Linux kernel, (the kernel's a huge media bottleneck for a 2000 era PowerPC CPU), uses 1 meg blocks, doesn't much fragment, works well in real time, and recovers quickly when the unit is unplugged.

It'd be nice to have more detail though, data structures, & whatnot, which data probably would have to come from studying, (as with NTFS). --AC (talk) 07:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]