Talk:Top quark condensate
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (September 2010) |
Untitled[edit]
This article incorrectly claimed that top condensate models are natural. This is false: these models are essentially just the Standard Model with some boundary condition on RGE flow. This probably means that the article should be rewritten to not claim that this is an alternative to the SM, but this would be rather technical.