Talk:Universal 3D

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Rename[edit]

I think we should rename this page. I would suggest "Universal 3D (U3D)"

Does somebody agree ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CADWatcher (talk • contribs) 14:49, 21 November 2007

I do not agree. The file format is called Universal 3D, U3D is just shorthand. No reason to specify both in the title. ~MDD 46 96 00:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem that this standard is not supported anymore, at least this is the feeling you get when you read the sourceforge forum on U3D (where the U3D sample source code is stored). Should this page be marked as no longer relevant? Fgenolini (talk) 15:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the page is relevant: there are tons of files (mainly PDF) containing U3D data on the web, and I think the standard is -more or less- still alive. There was an upgrade (4^th edition) in June 2007, even if Intel does not participate any more... The TC43 commitee is described here CADWatcher (talk) 13:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]