Talk:Urmila

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 4 January 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urmila (Ramayana) → Urmila – Ramayana word not needed -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear - if removing (Ramayana) is an advantage, and Urmila is the primary topic in books, then the Urmila dab page would perhaps be moved to Urmila (name). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no rationale provided for deleting the destination and merging it into a hatnote here. No rationale provided on why the disambiguator is not needed. So, this move request fails at having a rationale, since a different topic exists at the destination. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Urmila was originally a redirect to Urmila (Ramayana) before I added another link to it and converted it into a disambig. But later I noticed that [[Urmila (disambiguation) already exists. Further all other Urmila have a second or last name attached in the title itself except Urmila (Ramayana). So I proposed moving Urmila (Ramayana) to Urmila. Please check edit histories of relevant pages. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - it is an obvious primary use, unless there is someone now better known than the character in the Ramayana. Imc (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per IMC. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.