Talk:Japanese castles in Korea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Waeseong)

Lemma[edit]

How about naming this article something like “Japanese forts in Korea”? (See the fortification article for “fort”, “fortress” etc.) – Wikipeditor 09:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I propose naming this article Japanese castle in Korea, to make it consistent with Japanese castle. A descriptive name would be better than an unfamiliar foreign term per Wikipedia:Naming conventions: article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity. --Kusunose 22:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are all waeseong sufficiently castle-like to be called castles? I haven't read anything about them yet but I'd guess it would've been difficult for the Japanese to churn out a handful of castles deserving that name in so short a time, not to mention while fighting Koreans. Wikipeditor 00:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. Waeseong and Wajō are written as 倭城 in the Chinese character and literally translate to Japnese castle. In addition, the Korean source given in the article Suncheon Japanese Castle[1] (in English) refers them as castles. --Kusunose 02:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There seem to be 29 Japanese castles in Korea, all from the Imjin War period. I'll try to document them in photos: Japanese castles in Korea (13 out from 29). It shows that for example the Gupo Waeseong in Busan has remaining walls but is not included in the Wiki list. Others are hard to find. Still working on it. Jens-Olaf (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seong can be wall, fortress, castle, or even city. Translation would depend on the charasteristic of the structure. Some were castle-like, but most of these seong were more like fortresses. Dollarfifty 06:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely prefer the name "Japanese castles in Korea" over "forts" - as explained in the Japanese castle article, most castles built in Japan before 1575 or so were basically just wooden forts anyway. Only with the construction of Azuchi by Nobunaga did the stone bases and other more elaborate design elements come to be popular or common. That said, I am equally okay with leaving it under Waeseong, as all the Okinawan castles are under Gusuku and not under "Japanese castles in Okinawa" or "Okinawan castles." LordAmeth 12:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Given the kanji used for the title, "Japanese castle" would be best. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 15:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't see what the characters have to do with this and how they literally (?) translate to castle rather than fort (Wouldn't “fort” be the same character? Is there any rule that 城 means or must be translated never as “fort(s)”, but as “castle(s)”?) – if you all think “castles” is good, then let's use that. Wikipeditor 12:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the overwhelming majority of translations of 城 would be "castle" rather than "fort". I've only seen words such as 台場 (daiba), 防塞 (bōsai) and 砲台 (sōdai) used for "fort". That said, the phrase 城を襲う (shiro o osō) has been translated as both "raiding a castle" and "raiding a fort". By far the most common translation of 城 is "castle". By a very wide margin. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon me if I missed something obvious, but what does "Lemma" mean, and why is that the name of the section header for this discussion? LordAmeth 21:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Being attacked.jpg[edit]

Image:Being attacked.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]