Talk:Wat Tyler Cluverius Jr./GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk • contribs • count) 00:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   As far as I know, Find-a-Grave is not a reliable source (see for instance this thread) and should be removed.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   No real issues with the article apart from the Find-a-Grave usage. Excellent work. Parsecboy (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

   Okay, removed that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

   Alright, looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)