Talk:x86-64

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the X86-64 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Archives

Index 1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Licensing[edit]

A significant share of patents is still owned by Intel: [1]. Anyone minds to expand? --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 20:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking news! Tech companies protect their IP with software patents, and file new patents for improvements to existing IP. In other news, water wet. A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2023-01 feature level[edit]

The article should mention the x86-64 feature levels, and ideally compare them with i386, i486, i586 and i686 of x86-32. From phoronix.com:

Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 12:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Atualy there was a section about that, but using an other name Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 17:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article[edit]

This is a good article and I don't see any such message here. But I see such tags are given to less informative CS articles. Wikieditor 2027 (talk) 23:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]