Talk:XACML

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 March 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Moved Obligations out of the "New in XACML 3.0" section, since Obligations have been in XACML long before. 94.136.86.20 (talk) 15:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ground-breaking work[edit]

"The implementation of delegation is new in XACML 3.0, following ground-breaking work by Butler Lampson and a number of other successful research projects which prototyped the concept" - the cited reference is from 1991. The statement is a bit misleading, and it's not quite clear what exactly they prototyped. --JensMueller (talk) 09:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the citation appears irrelevant here (XACML did not exist in 1991) I would suggest that this citation is removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.154.222.237 (talk) 06:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A simple description[edit]

This subject needs a simple description added for the less technical people looking for a an answer to "what is it??" Back ache (talk) 11:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External Links section[edit]

This section misses a number of XACML compliant products, e.g. ObjectSecurity OpenPMF (www.openpmf.com)75.61.130.18 (talk) 04:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Examples can be misunderstood[edit]

Using intuitive language to describe the XACML examples conceals the fact that XACML is a highly complex format and language - better show the full XACML file that implements each of the example.75.61.130.18 (talk) 04:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Time-based Authorization in XACML[edit]

AnyOf seems not right when a time frame is given as a requirement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.111.105.94 (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a manual[edit]

Did a bold cleanup, Wikipedia is not a tech manual. Rm unsourced material. Add formatting. // Timothy :: talk 06:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you deleted a lot of relevant content that I spent years putting together. I do not understand why history, architecture, and design have been removed for XACML but are still very much present on other pages like OAuth and SAML. David (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a result another user came in and added the details you had removed but made mistakes. Rules cannot contain multiple conditions. This is horrendous. David (talk) 17:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]