Template:Opinion polling for the 2021 New York City mayoral election/Democratic primary

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Graphical summary (first-past-the-post polls)[edit]

Among those supporting a candidate (first-past-the-post polls)

Ranked-choice polls[edit]

Poll source Date(s)
administered 		Sample
size[A] 		Margin
of error 		RCV
count
Eric Adams
Shaun Donovan
Kathryn Garcia
Raymond McGuire
Dianne Morales
Scott Stringer
Maya Wiley
Andrew Yang
 Others Undecided
Data for Progress (D) Jun 18–20, 2021 1,354 (LV) ± 3.0% BA[B] 26% 3% 18% 3% 2% 5% 21% 12% 2% 6%
1 28% 3% 19% 4% 2% 5% 22% 13% 3% –
2 28% 3% 20% 4% 3% 5% 23% 13% –
3 28% 3% 20% 4% – 6% 24% 14% –
4 29% – 21% 4% – 6% 25% 14% –
5 30% – 24% – – 6% 25% 14% –
6 32% – 26% – – – 27% 15% –
7 38% – 31% – – – 31% – –
8 54% – – – – – 46% – –
8[C] 48% – 52% – – – – – –
Citizen Data[D] Jun 14–17, 2021 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 1 32% 5% 18% 3% 6% 6% 18% 11% 2% –
2 32% 5% 18% 3% 6% 6% 18% 12% –
3 33% 5% 18% – 6% 7% 19% 12% –
4 34% – 19% – 6% 7% 20% 13% –
5 36% – 20% – – 8% 21% 15% –
6 37% – 22% – – – 26% 15% –
7 44% – 28% – – – 28% – –
8 56% – – – – – 44% – –
8[E] 54% – 46% – – – – – –
8[E] 67% – – – – – – 33% –
8[E] – – 51% – – – 49% – –
8[E] – – 60% – – – – 40% –
8[E] – – – – – – 59% 41% –
Ipsos Jun 10–17, 2021 702 (LV) ± 5.7% BA[B] 28% 5% 15% 5% 1% 8% 13% 20% – 6%
1 29% 5% 16% 5% 1% 8% 13% 21% –
2 29% 5% 16% 5% – 8% 14% 22%
3 31% 7% 16% – – 9% 14% 22%
4 34% – 17% – – 12% 15% 23%
5 36% – 20% – – – 16% 27%
6 43% – 25% – – – – 31%
7 56% – – – – – – 44%
Emerson College[F] Jun 15–16, 2021 664 (LV) ± 3.7% BA[B] 23% 2% 17% 3% 2% 9% 18% 14%
1%
Chang: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
 10%
2 26% 3% 19% 4% 2% 10% 20% 15%
1%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 0%
 –
3 26% 3% 19% 4% 2% 10% 20% 15%
1%
Chang: 1%
4 26% 3% 20% 4% 2% 10% 21% 15% –
5 26% 3% 20% 4% – 10% 22% 15% –
6 27% – 21% 5% – 10% 22% 15% –
7 29% – 21% – – 11% 22% 17% –
8 32% – 25% – – – 26% 18% –
9 41% – 30% – – – 29% – –
10 52% – 48% – – – – – –
Change Research (D)[G] Jun 11–14, 2021 822 (LV) ± 3.4% BA[B] 23% 4% 19% 3% 1% 8% 19% 12%
0%
Chang: 0%
Foldenauer: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
 10%
2 26% 4% 22% 3% 2% 9% 21% 13%
1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Prince: 0%
 –
3 26% 4% 22% 3% 2% 9% 21% 13%
1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
4 26% 4% 22% 3% 2% 9% 21% 13%
1%
Wright: 1%
5 26% 5% 22% 3% 2% 9% 21% 13% –
6 26% 5% 22% 3% – 9% 22% 13% –
7 27% 5% 22% – – 10% 23% 14% –
8 28% – 23% – – 10% 23% 16% –
9 30% – 27% – – – 26% 17% –
10 37% – 33% – – – 30% – –
11 49% – 51% – – – – – –
Schoen Cooperman Research (D)[H] Jun 10–13, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% BA[B] 22% 6% 14% 4% 4% 9% 16% 18% 0% 7%
1 24% 7% 15% 5% 4% 9% 17% 19% –
2 24% 7% 16% 5% – 10% 18% 20%
3 24% 8% 17% – – 10% 19% 22%
4 26% – 18% – – 11% 21% 24%
5 31% – 20% – – – 23% 26%
6 40% – – – – – 28% 32%
7 55% – – – – – – 45%
Public Opinion Strategies (R)[I] Jun 9–13, 2021 500 (LV) ± 4.4% BA[B] 21% 4% 20% 2% 2% 8% 18% 13%
2%
Chang: 1%
Taylor: 1%
Prince: <1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Wright: 0%
 9%
1 24% 4% 22% 2% 2% 9% 20% 14%
3%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Wright: 0%
 –
2 24% 4% 22% 2% 2% 9% 20% 14%
3%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
3 24% 4% 22% 2% 2% 9% 20% 14%
2%
Chang: 1%
Taylor: 1%
4 24% 4% 22% 2% 3% 9% 20% 14%
1%
Chang: 1%
5 25% 4% 22% 2% 3% 9% 21% 14% –
6 25% 4% 22% – 3% 9% 21% 15% –
7 26% 4% 23% – – 9% 22% 15% –
8 27% – 25% – – 10% 23% 15% –
9 29% – 28% – – – 25% 17% –
10 38% – 33% – – – 29% – –
11 48% – 52% – – – – – –
Honan Strategy Group (D)[J] May 26 – Jun 10, 2021 950 (LV) ± 3.2% BA[B] 28% 9% 13% 1% 1% 6% 7% 19% – 16%
1 33% 11% 15% 1% 1% 7% 9% 23% –
2 33% 11% 16% 1% – 7% 9% 23%
3 34% 11% 16% – – 7% 9% 23%
4 35% 12% 17% – – – 11% 25%
5 39% 13% 19% – – – – 29%
6 44% – 24% – – – – 33%
7 56% – – – – – – 44%
Marist College[K] Jun 3–9, 2021 876 (LV) ± 3.8% BA[B] 24% 3% 17% 3% 3% 7% 15% 13%
2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Foldenauer: <1%
Taylor: <1%
Wright: <1%
 13%
1 28% 3% 19% 4% 4% 8% 17% 15%
2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Foldenauer: <1%
Taylor: <1%
Wright: <1%
 –
2 28% 3% 19% 4% 4% 8% 17% 15%
2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: <1%
Wright: <1%
3 28% 3% 19% 4% 4% 8% 17% 15%
2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: <1%
4 28% 3% 19% 4% 4% 8% 17% 15%
2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
5 28% 3% 20% 4% 4% 8% 17% 15%
1%
Prince: 1%
6 28% 4% 20% 4% 4% 8% 17% 15% –
7 29% – 20% 4% 5% 9% 17% 16% –
8 30% – 21% – 5% 9% 18% 17% –
9 31% – 22% – – 9% 20% 17% –
10 34% – 24% – – – 22% 19% –
11 43% – 30% – – – 27% – –
12 56% – 44% – – – – – –
Emerson College[F] Jun 7–8, 2021 725 (LV) ± 3.6% BA[B] 23% 4% 12% 3% 2% 9% 17% 15%
4%
Taylor: 2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Wright: 0%
 12%
2 26% 4% 14% 3% 2% 11% 19% 17%
5%
Taylor: 2%
Chang: 2%
Prince: 1%
 –
3 26% 5% 14% 4% 2% 11% 19% 17%
4%
Taylor: 2%
Chang: 2%
4 26% 5% 14% 4% 3% 11% 19% 18%
2%
Taylor: 2%
5 26% 5% 14% 4% 3% 11% 19% 19% –
6 26% 5% 14% 4% – 11% 21% 19% –
7 28% 5% 15% – – 11% 21% 20% –
8 29% – 15% – – 12% 22% 22% –
9 33% – 19% – – – 26% 23% –
10 40% – – – – – 33% 27% –
11 59% – – – – – 41% – –
Ipsos[L] May 17–31, 2021 906 (LV) ± 4.5% BA[B] 24% 4% 13% 5% 5% 10% 10% 17% – 11%
1 27% 5% 15% 5% 6% 11% 12% 19% –
2 28% – 16% 5% 6% 12% 12% 20%
3 30% – 17% – 7% 13% 13% 20%
4 32% – 18% – – 14% 16% 21%
5 37% – 22% – – – 19% 23%
6 42% – 29% – – – – 28%
7 60% – 40% – – – – –
7[M] 58% – – – – – – 42%
Emerson College[F] May 23–24, 2021 570 (LV) ± 4.1% BA[B] 20% 5% 21% 2% 7% 10% 9% 16%
2%
Foldenauer: 1%
Prince: 1%
Chang: 0%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
 9%
2 22% 6% 23% 2% 8% 10% 9% 17%
2%
Foldenauer: 1%
Prince: 1%
Chang: 0%
 –
3 22% 6% 23% 2% 8% 10% 9% 17%
2%
Foldenauer: 1%
Prince: 1%
4 22% 6% 23% 2% 8% 11% 10% 17%
1%
Foldenauer: 1%
5 22% 6% 23% 2% 8% 12% 10% 17% –
6 24% 6% 24% – 8% 12% 10% 17% –
7 25% – 26% – 8% 12% 10% 19% –
8 25% – 27% – – 13% 15% 19% –
9 28% – 31% – – – 20% 22% –
10 34% – 40% – – – – 26% –
11 45% – 55% – – – – – –
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] May 17–20, 2021 749 (LV) ± 3.6% BA[B] 16% 4% 10% 5% 7% 13% 8% 19%
7%
Foldenauer: 4%
Chang: 2%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
"Other": 0%
 13%
1 18% 5% 11% 5% 8% 15% 9% 21%
8%
Foldenauer: 5%
Chang: 2%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
"Other": 0%
 –
2 18% 5% 11% 5% 8% 15% 9% 21%
8%
Foldenauer: 5%
Chang: 2%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: 0%
3 18% 5% 11% 5% 8% 15% 9% 21%
8%
Foldenauer: 5%
Chang: 2%
Prince: 1%
4 18% 5% 11% 5% 8% 15% 9% 21%
7%
Foldenauer: 5%
Chang: 2%
5 19% 5% 12% 6% 8% 15% 10% 22%
5%
Foldenauer: 5%
6 19% 5% 12% 7% 9% 16% 11% 22% –
7 20% – 13% 8% 9% 16% 11% 23% –
8 21% – 14% – 9% 19% 13% 24% –
9 22% – 14% – – 22% 17% 25% –
10 25% – – – – 25% 21% 29% –
11 33% – – – – 31% – 36% –
12 49% – – – – – – 51% –
Public Opinion Strategies (R)[I] May 14–17, 2021 500 (LV) ± 4.4% BA[B] 18% 4% 11% 6% 6% 8% 10% 19%
2%
Prince: 1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Foldenauer: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 14%
1 21% 5% 13% 7% 7% 10% 11% 22%
2%
Prince: 1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 –
2 21% 5% 13% 7% 7% 10% 11% 22%
2%
Prince: 1%
Wright: 1%
Taylor: 0%
3 21% 5% 13% 7% 7% 10% 11% 23%
2%
Prince: 1%
Wright: 1%
4 21% 5% 13% 8% 7% 10% 11% 23%
1%
Prince: 1%
5 21% 5% 13% 8% 7% 10% 12% 23% –
6 23% – 13% 9% 8% 11% 13% 24% –
7 24% – 15% 10% – 11% 16% 24% –
8 27% – 16% – – 12% 18% 26% –
9 30% – 20% – – – 21% 29% –
10 36% – – – – – 30% 34% –
11 52% – – – – – – 48% –
Emerson College[F] May 13–15, 2021 631 (LV) ± 3.8% BA[B] 18% 5% 8% 4% 6% 15% 4% 15%
3%
Chang: 2%
Taylor: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Prince: 0%
Wright: 0%
 23%
2 23% 7% 10% 5% 7% 20% 5% 20%
3%
Chang: 2%
Taylor: 1%
 –
3 23% 7% 11% 5% 7% 20% 5% 20%
3%
Chang: 3%
4 23% 7% 11% 5% 7% 20% 5% 22% –
5 24% 7% 13% 6% 8% 20% – 23% –
6 26% 9% 13% – 9% 20% – 23% –
7 27% 9% 18% – – 22% – 24% –
8 29% – 21% – – 24% – 26% –
9 36% – – – – 31% – 33% –
10 53% – – – – – – 47% –
Change Research (D) May 11–12, 2021 418 (LV) ± 4.8% BA[B] 21% 6% 11% 6% 5% 8% 6% 18%
2%
"Would not vote": 1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 18%
2 26% 7% 14% 7% 6% 10% 7% 22%
1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
 –
3 26% 7% 14% 8% 6% 10% 7% 22%
1%
Wright: 1%
4 26% 7% 14% 8% 6% 10% 8% 22% –
5 26% 7% 16% 8% – 11% 10% 23% –
6 27% – 17% 9% – 12% 11% 25% –
7 28% – 18% – – 14% 11% 28% –
8 31% – 21% – – 17% – 31% –
9 37% – 26% – – – – 37% –
10 50% – – – – – – 50% –
Change Research (D) May 6–12, 2021 1,422 (LV) ± 2.6% BA[B] 19% 7% 7% 7% 5% 9% 7% 16%
2%
"Would not vote": 1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 20%
2 24% 9% 8% 9% 6% 11% 9% 21%
1%
Wright: 1%
Prince: 0%
 –
3 24% 9% 9% 9% 7% 11% 9% 21%
1%
Wright: 1%
4 25% 9% 9% 9% 7% 11% 10% 21% –
5 26% 9% 9% 9% – 12% 13% 22% –
6 27% – 11% 11% – 14% 13% 24% –
7 30% – 12% – – 15% 15% 28% –
8 34% – – – – 18% 18% 31% –
9 41% – – – – 23% – 37% –
10 53% – – – – – – 47% –
Schoen Cooperman Research (D)[O] May 4–9, 2021 1,003 (LV) ± 3.1% BA[B] 17% 6% 8% 6% 4% 10% 10% 21% 1% 17%
1 21% 7% 9% 8% 5% 12% 12% 26% –
2 22% 7% 10% 9% – 13% 13% 26%
3 23% – 10% 10% – 15% 14% 28%
4 25% – 12% – – 17% 16% 30%
5 28% – – – – 19% 20% 33%
6 36% – – – – – 24% 40%
7 47% – – – – – – 53%
Mercury Public Affairs (D)[P] Apr 26 – May 1, 2021 600 (LV) ± 4.0% BA[B] 14% 6% 4% 6% 3% 14% 6% 21% – 26%
1 15% 8% 5% 6% 5% 18% 8% 35% –
2 15% 8% 5% 6% – 19% 11% 36%
3 15% 8% – 7% – 20% 12% 36%
4 17% 9% – – – 21% 13% 40%
5 19% – – – – 24% 14% 43%
6 23% – – – – 28% – 48%
7 – – – – – 39% – 61%
Benenson Strategy Group (D)[Q] Apr 16–21, 2021 1,558 (LV) ± 2.5% BA[B] 17% 7% 5% 8% 7% 11% 8% 22% 1% 14%
1 20% 8% 6% 9% 8% 12% 10% 26% –
2 21% 8% – 10% 9% 14% 11% 27%
3 22% – – 11% 10% 16% 12% 30%
4 23% – – 12% – 18% 15% 32%
5 27% – – – – 20% 18% 36%
6 31% – – – – 26% – 43%
7 44% – – – – – – 56%
Ipsos[L] Apr 1–15, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 4.7% BA[B] 13% 5% 5% 6% 5% 14% 8% 23% – 21%
1 17% 6% 6% 7% 7% 17% 10% 29% –
2 18% 7% – 7% 8% 19% 11% 30%
3 18% – – 9% 8% 21% 12% 32%
4 20% – – 10% – 22% 15% 34%
5 23% – – – – 25% 16% 36%
6 27% – – – – 30% – 43%
7 – – – – – 43% – 57%
Data for Progress (D) Mar 21 – Apr 5, 2021 1,007 (LV) ± 3.0% BA[B] 13% 7% 4% 6% 3% 11% 10% 26%
5%
"A different candidate": 4%
Menchaca: 1%
 14%
8 41% – – – – – – 59% –
8[R] – 27% – – – – – 73%
8[S] – – – – – 39% – 61%
8[T] – – – – – – 32% 68%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] Mar 12–18, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% BA[B] 15% 4% 6% 5% 3% 12% 7% 25%
3%
Menchaca: 2%
"Other": 1%
 20%
1 18% 5% 8% 6% 3% 15% 9% 31%
4%
Menchaca: 3%
"Other": 1%
 –
2 18% 5% 8% 6% 3% 15% 9% 31%
3%
Menchaca: 3%
3 18% 6% 9% 6% 4% 16% 10% 32% –
4 19% 6% 10% 6% – 16% 11% 32% –
5 20% – 10% 7% – 18% 11% 33% –
6 22% – 11% – – 19% 12% 35% –
7 24% – – – – 22% 15% 39% –
8 28% – – – – 26% – 46% –
9 41% – – – – – – 59% –
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] Jan 15–19, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% BA[B] 17% 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 8% 25%
1%
"Other": 1%
Iscol: <1%
Menchaca: <1%
Sutton: <1%
 32%
1 26% 1% 2% 2% 2% 18% 11% 37%
2%
Sutton: 1%
"Other": 1%
Iscol: <1%
Menchaca: <1%
 –
2 26% 1% 2% 2% 2% 19% 11% 37%
1%
Sutton: 1%
Iscol: <1%
Menchaca: <1%
3 26% 1% 2% 2% 2% 19% 11% 37%
1%
Sutton: 1%
Menchaca: <1%
4 26% 1% 2% 2% 2% 19% 11% 37%
1%
Sutton: 1%
5 26% 1% 2% 2% 2% 19% 12% 37% –
6 26% – 2% 2% 2% 19% 12% 37% –
7 26% – 2% – 2% 20% 12% 38% –
8 27% – 3% – – 20% 12% 39% –
9 27% – – – – 20% 13% 39% –
10 30% – – – – 24% – 46% –
11 39% – – – – – – 61% –
Slingshot Strategies (D) Nov 30 –
Dec 6, 2020 		1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% BA[B] 11% 2% 3% 2% 2% 11% 7% 17%
20%
Quinn: 7%
Rose: 5%
Menchaca: 3%
Iscol: 2%
Sutton: 2%
"Other": 1%
 25%
1 15% 3% 4% 3% 2% 15% 9% 23%
25%
Quinn: 10%
Rose: 6%
Menchaca: 3%
Iscol: 2%
Sutton: 2%
"Other": 2%
 –
2 15% 3% 5% 3% 2% 15% 9% 23%
26%
Quinn: 10%
Rose: 7%
Menchaca: 4%
Iscol: 3%
Sutton: 2%
3 16% 3% 5% 3% 3% 15% 9% 23%
24%
Quinn: 10%
Rose: 7%
Menchaca: 4%
Iscol: 3%
4 16% 3% 5% 3% – 15% 9% 24%
24%
Quinn: 10%
Rose: 7%
Menchaca: 4%
Iscol: 3%
5 16% 3% 6% 3% – 15% 9% 24%
22%
Quinn: 11%
Rose: 7%
Menchaca: 4%
6 16% – 6% 4% – 16% 10% 24%
24%
Quinn: 11%
Rose: 8%
Menchaca: 5%
7 17% – 6% – – 17% 10% 25%
25%
Quinn: 11%
Rose: 9%
Menchaca: 5%
8 18% – 7% – – 18% 11% 26%
21%
Quinn: 12%
Rose: 9%
9 19% – – – – 18% 12% 27%
23%
Quinn: 13%
Rose: 10%
10 21% – – – – 21% 14% 29%
14%
Quinn: 14%
11 26% – – – – 24% – 33%
17%
Quinn: 17%
12 30% – – – – 29% – 41% –
13 42% – – – – – – 58% –

First-past-the-post polls[edit]

Poll source Date(s)
administered 		Sample
size[A] 		Margin
of error
Eric Adams
Shaun Donovan
Kathryn Garcia
Raymond McGuire
Dianne Morales
Scott Stringer
Maya Wiley
Andrew Yang
 Others Undecided
Data for Progress (D) Jun 18–20, 2021 1,354 (LV) ± 3.0% 26% 3% 18% 3% 2% 5% 21% 12% 2% 6%
Citizen Data[D][a] Jun 14–17, 2021 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 32% 5% 18% 3% 6% 6% 18% 11% 2% –
Ipsos Jun 10–17, 2021 702 (LV) ± 5.7% 27% 4% 12% 5% 2% 9% 12% 20% <1% 7%
Emerson College[F][a] Jun 15–16, 2021 664 (LV) ± 3.7% 23% 2% 17% 3% 2% 9% 18% 14%
1%
Chang: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
 10%
McLaughlin & Associates (R)[U] Jun 10–15, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 21% 3% 16% 2% 3% 7% 17% 10% 1% 21%
Change Research (D)[G][a] Jun 11–14, 2021 822 (LV) ± 3.4% 23% 4% 19% 3% 1% 8% 19% 12%
0%
Chang: 0%
Foldenauer: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
 10%
Schoen Cooperman Research (D)[H][a] Jun 10–13, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 22% 6% 14% 4% 4% 9% 16% 18% 0% 7%
Public Opinion Strategies (R)[I][a] Jun 9–13, 2021 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 21% 4% 20% 2% 2% 8% 18% 13%
2%
Chang: 1%
Taylor: 1%
Prince: <1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Wright: 0%
 9%
Data for Progress (D) Jun 7–13, 2021 998 (LV) ± 3.0% 26% 2% 14% 4% 3% 8% 20% 16% 3% 4%
Honan Strategy Group (D)[J] May 26 – Jun 10, 2021 950 (LV) ± 3.2% 31% 9% 15% 1% 1% 6% 7% 21% – 9%
Marist College[K][a] Jun 3–9, 2021 876 (LV) ± 3.8% 24% 3% 17% 3% 3% 7% 15% 13%
2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Foldenauer: <1%
Taylor: <1%
Wright: <1%
 13%
Emerson College[F][a] Jun 7–8, 2021 725 (LV) ± 3.6% 23% 4% 12% 3% 2% 9% 17% 15%
4%
Taylor: 2%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Wright: 0%
 12%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N][a] Jun 1–6, 2021 1,191 (LV) ± 2.8% 17% 3% 14% 4% 7% 12% 8% 16%
7%
Foldenauer: 4%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Wright: 1%
Taylor: 0%
"Other": 0%
 12%
Media Predict[V] May 27 – Jun 6, 2021 501 (RV) ± 6.0% 20% 4% 15% 1% 5% 8% 7% 19% – 20%
Ipsos[L] May 17–31, 2021 906 (LV) ± 4.5% 22% 3% 15% 4% 5% 10% 9% 16% <1% 16%
Emerson College[F][a] May 23–24, 2021 570 (LV) ± 4.1% 20% 5% 21% 2% 7% 10% 9% 16%
2%
Foldenauer: 1%
Prince: 1%
Chang: 0%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
 9%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N][a] May 17–20, 2021 749 (LV) ± 3.6% 16% 4% 10% 5% 7% 13% 8% 19%
7%
Foldenauer: 4%
Chang: 2%
Prince: 1%
Taylor: 0%
Wright: 0%
"Other": 0%
 13%
Core Decision Analytics[W] May 15–19, 2021 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 18% 4% 11% 4% 9% 7% 9% 13% 1% 26%
Public Opinion Strategies (R)[I][a] May 14–17, 2021 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 18% 4% 11% 6% 6% 8% 10% 19%
2%
Prince: 1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Foldenauer: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 14%
Emerson College[F][a] May 13–15, 2021 631 (LV) ± 3.8% 18% 5% 8% 4% 6% 15% 4% 15%
3%
Chang: 2%
Taylor: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Prince: 0%
Wright: 0%
 23%
Change Research (D)[a] May 11–12, 2021 418 (LV) ± 4.8% 21% 6% 11% 6% 5% 8% 6% 18%
2%
"Would not vote": 1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 18%
Change Research (D)[a] May 6–12, 2021 1,422 (LV) ± 2.6% 19% 7% 7% 7% 5% 9% 7% 16%
2%
"Would not vote": 1%
Wright: 1%
Chang: 0%
Prince: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 20%
Schoen Cooperman Research (D)[O][a] May 4–9, 2021 1,003 (LV) ± 3.1% 17% 6% 8% 6% 4% 10% 10% 21% 1% 17%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N][a] Apr 20–27 and
May 3–6, 2021 		1,393 (LV) ± 2.6% 11% 6% 5% 10% 6% 15% 7% 21%
6%
Foldenauer: 3%
Chang: 1%
Wright: 1%
"Other": 1%
Prince: 0%
 13%
275 (LV) ± 5.9% 12% 10% 5% 9% 4% –[X] 8% 27%
9%
"Other": 4%
Foldenauer: 3%
Chang: 1%
Prince: 1%
Wright: 0%
 15%
Honan Strategy Group (D)[Y] Apr 24 – May 2, 2021 1,100 (LV) ± 3.0% 22% 0% 1% 2% 12% 13% 3% 20% 1% 25%
Mercury Public Affairs (D)[P][a] Apr 26 – May 1, 2021 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 14% 6% 4% 6% 3% 14% 6% 21% – 26%
GQR Research (D)[Z] Apr 27–29, 2021 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 21% 8% 6% 6% 6% 15% 7% 18% 1% 11%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N][a] Apr 20–27, 2021 824 (LV) ± 3.4% 11% 6% 3% 9% 5% 16% 6% 24%
5%
Foldenauer: 3%
Chang: 1%
"Other": 1%
Prince: 0%
Wright: 0%
 14%
Benenson Strategy Group (D)[Q][a] Apr 16–21, 2021 1,558 (LV) ± 2.5% 17% 7% 5% 8% 7% 11% 8% 22% 1% 14%
Ipsos[L] Apr 1–15, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 4.7% 13% 6% 4% 6% 5% 11% 7% 22% <1% 26%
Data for Progress (D) Mar 21 – Apr 5, 2021 1,007 (LV) ± 3.0% 13% 7% 4% 6% 3% 11% 10% 26%
5%
"A different candidate": 4%
Menchaca: 1%
 14%
Core Decision Analytics[W] Mar 15–18, 2021 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 10% 2% 2% 4% 2% 5% 6% 16% 1% 50%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N][a] Mar 12–18, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 15% 4% 6% 5% 3% 12% 7% 25%
3%
Menchaca: 2%
"Other": 1%
 20%
Emerson College[F] Mar 4–6, 2021 644 (LV) ± 3.8% 19% 4% 5% 3% 4% 6% 9% 32%
2%
Chang: 1%
Menchaca: 1%
Foldenauer: 0%
Kavovit: 0%
Sutton: 0%
Taylor: 0%
 17%
Media Predict[V] Feb 12–25, 2021 894 (RV) ± 3.3% 11% 2% 4% 2% 3% 9% 6% 27%
2%
Menchaca: 2%
 34%
Core Decision Analytics[W] Jan 20–25, 2021 842 (LV) ± 3.4% 17% 8% 2% 2% 2% 13% 8% 28%
1%
Iscol: 1%
 19%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N][a] Jan 15–19, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 17% 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 8% 25%
1%
"Other": 1%
Iscol: <1%
Menchaca: <1%
Sutton: <1%
 32%
Public Policy Polling (D)[AA] Dec 16–17, 2020 755 (LV) ± 3.6% 16% – – 4% 5% 5% 7% 17%
6%
Quinn: 6%
 40%
Slingshot Strategies (D) Nov 30 – Dec 6, 2020 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 14% 2% 3% 2% 2% 11% 7% 20%
17%
Quinn: 7%
Rose: 6%
Menchaca: 2%
Iscol: 1%
Sutton: 1%
"Other": 0%
 20%
Data for Progress (D) Jan 13–19, 2020 366 (LV) ± 5.1% 9% – – – 2% 5% – –
38%
Johnson: 10%
Díaz Jr.: 8%
Liu: 7%
Quinn: 6%
Brewer: 2%
Mark-Viverto: 2%
Taylor: 2%
Foldenauer: 1%
Sutton: 0%
 46%
Notes
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u First-choice results from a ranked-choice poll

Head-to-head polls[edit]

Poll source Date(s)
administered 		Sample
size[A] 		Margin
of error
Eric Adams
Kathryn Garcia
Raymond McGuire
Dianne Morales
Scott Stringer
Maya Wiley
Andrew Yang
 Undecided
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] Jun 1–6, 2021 1,191 (LV) ± 2.8% 44% – – – – – 42% 15%
– 41% – – – – 45% 14%
– – – – 36% – 46% 18%
– – – – – 32% 51% 17%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] May 17–20, 2021 749 (LV) ± 3.6% 37% – – – – – 44% 18%
– – – – 36% – 44% 21%
– – – – – 34% 45% 21%
Honan Strategy Group (D)[Y] Apr 24 – May 2, 2021 1,100 (LV) ± 3.0% 51% – 12% – – – – 37%
44% – – – 33% – – 24%
50% – – – – 19% – 31%
39% – – – – – 38% 23%
30% – – 19% – 5% 22% 23%
31% – – – 20% 8% 26% 16%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] Apr 20–27, 2021 824 (LV) ± 3.4% 31% – – – – – 44% 25%
– – – – 33% – 47% 21%
– – – – – 25% 51% 24%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] Mar 12–18, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 33% – – – – – 47% 20%
– – – – 27% – 52% 21%
– – – – – 20% 54% 26%
Slingshot Strategies (D)[N] Jan 15–19, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 27% – – – – – 48% 25%
– – – – 27% – 49% 24%
– – – – – 20% 50% 30%
Polling key and sponsors
  1. ^ a b c Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Before allocation (including undecided respondents)
  3. ^ Hypothetical scenario with Wiley eliminated instead of Garcia after round 7
  4. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by FairVote
  5. ^ a b c d e Hypothetical scenario based on FairVote's RCV simulations with various permutations of candidates
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i This poll was sponsored by WPIX and NewsNation
  7. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by New Generation of Leadership PAC, which supports Garcia for mayor
  8. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by Strong Leadership NYC, Inc., which supports Adams for mayor
  9. ^ a b c d This poll was sponsored by the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
  10. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by the NYC-based lobbying group Capalino & Company, which is not working on behalf of any candidates
  11. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by WNBC, WNJU, and Politico
  12. ^ a b c d This poll was sponsored by Spectrum News NY1
  13. ^ Hypothetical scenario with Garcia eliminated instead of Yang after round 6
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n This poll was sponsored by Yang's campaign committee
  15. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by New Yorkers for a Better Future, Inc.
  16. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by Future Forward NYC, Inc., which supports Yang for mayor
  17. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by StudentsFirstNY, a pro-charter schools group, which released this poll just before its executive director formed a pro-Adams PAC
  18. ^ Hypothetical scenario with all candidates eliminated but Donovan and Yang
  19. ^ Hypothetical scenario with all candidates eliminated but Stringer and Yang
  20. ^ Hypothetical scenario with all candidates eliminated but Wiley and Yang
  21. ^ This poll was sponsored by the New York Post, whose editorial board endorsed Adams
  22. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by Univision 41 Nueva York (WXTV)
  23. ^ a b c This poll was conducted by Core Decision Analytics, which is working with Garcia's campaign, and was sponsored by the NYC-based lobbying group Fontas Advisors, which is not working on behalf of any candidates
  24. ^ Hypothetical scenario excluding Stringer
  25. ^ a b This poll was sponsored by Hotel Workers for Stronger Communities, which supports Adams for mayor
  26. ^ This poll was sponsored by Corey Johnson's comptroller campaign committee
  27. ^ This poll was sponsored by Democrats for Education Reform, a pro-charter schools group
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Opinion_polling_for_the_2021_New_York_City_mayoral_election/Democratic_primary&oldid=1064740680"