Template talk:Computational physics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconComputing Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconPhysics Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

You could probably unlock this page template now, I would like to add a few more scientists responsible for the development of Computational Fluid Dyanmics 128.156.10.80 (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Mike134[reply]

I have a few ideas for a few more scientists; how about Stanislaw Ulam and Aneesur Rahman (creator of MD)? 41.58.9.48 (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hell yes - Ulam was such a crucial figure he just *has* to be on this list. Ema--or (talk) 02:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The list of potentials[edit]

Hey, I just came across this template, and think the list of potentials leaves out some honourable mentions, specifically the Mie potential, Stockmayer potential, Buckingham potential, Hard sphere potential, and Sutherland potential although the latter (sadly) doesn't have a page yet. I can imagine that you want to keep this list somewhat exclusive, otherwise it would just grow out of control, but I believe the ones mentioned are so central to modern and historical developments in physics and physical chemistry that it feels strange to leave them out. ItsBigBoat (talk) 21:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]