Template talk:Country data Ryukyu Islands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconJapan: Ryukyu Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 03:58, May 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the Ryukyu task force.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Ryūkyū FA Flag[edit]

I was editing a page and found that I could not get a flagicon for the Ryūkyū national football team. I found that this was the FA flag: . I do not know how to add a new variant, but I think that {{flagicon|Ryukyu|football}} could be its shortcut. IPOokap (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 April 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Country data RyukyuTemplate:Country data Ryukyu Islands – The flags were used by an American entity which the Americans named the Ryukyu Islands. Nanshu (talk) 10:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Japan has been notified of this discussion. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Flag Template has been notified of this discussion. Favonian (talk) 11:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, this is consistent with the name of the occupied entity.Fulmard (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.