User talk:Adeilnkrm

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
5,846		Continent (talk)	Add sources
20		Jukola relay (talk)	Add sources
394		Game design (talk)	Add sources
4,339		Arizona (talk)	Add sources
106		Eye protection (talk)	Add sources
852		Card game (talk)	Add sources
392		Table (information) (talk)	Cleanup
82		Bicycle touring (talk)	Cleanup
259		Stretch Armstrong (talk)	Cleanup
18		World Trail Orienteering Championships (talk)	Expand
1,858		Apple Watch (talk)	Expand
32		History of orienteering (talk)	Expand
903		Homelessness in the United States (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
297		Game mechanics (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
927		Board game (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
253		Mouse Trap (game) (talk)	Merge
979		Remote sensing (talk)	Merge
212		Algorithmic efficiency (talk)	Merge
39		TFcon (talk)	Wikify
407		History of cartography (talk)	Wikify
205		Gamepad (talk)	Wikify
15		Backcountry (historical region) (talk)	Orphan
3		Borden Dent (talk)	Orphan
6		Airlog (talk)	Orphan
51		Topological map (talk)	Stub
11		Radio Orienteering in a Compact Area (talk)	Stub
12		Route choice (orienteering) (talk)	Stub
17		Thumb compass (talk)	Stub
11		Fox Oring (talk)	Stub
24		Trail orienteering (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don Welge Memorial Bridge has been accepted

Don Welge Memorial Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

"Added rankings"

I see you are adding unsourced rankings sections to historic college football seasons. These secions need to be sourced. Also, rather than "Week 1" designations for each ranking period, it would be better IMO to use dates the rankings were released. Cbl62 (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate the insight, though I'm not entirely clear on how the historic rankings sections differ from the more recent rankings sections with regards to sourcing. Because there isn't much, if any, sourcing on more recent sections, I figured it would be okay not to source the more historic sections. Also, more recent rankings sections include either the 'further information' or 'see also' template that leads to the overall season Top 20/25 rankings pages, in which those have references. I apologize if I misinterpreted this. Adeilnkrm (talk) 20:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)