User talk:Creatine97
Please comment[edit]
This is a message for all regulars at the “apartheid” AfD series. I believe there may have been a breakthrough. Please share your thoughts here. Thanks. --Targeman 03:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Following your recent participation in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of French apartheid, you may be interested to know that a related article, Allegations of Chinese apartheid, is currently being discussed on AfD. Comments can be left at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid. -- ChrisO 15:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
La Marque du tueur[edit]
I don't know if you'll remember me from the Seijun Suzuki article. I've been trying to get Branded to Kill up to FA standards but I'm having a hard time tracking down it's influence in Japan--which I know is huge. I've added a bit about Getting Any?, Postman Blues, Lupin III and Golgo 13 but I don't have any what you might call "super reliable" sources. I remember you're expert in reference hunting so I was wondering if you'd come across anything that might work. The special features on the Japanese DVDs have me stumped too but that's secondary. It's no trouble if you don't have anything but I thought I'd try asking around. Thanks, Doctor Sunshine talk 11:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for you comment and for taking the time to do that. The MidnightEye link is better than what I'd been hoping for. Even if I can't keep the the four influences above, and I think they probably meet reliability standards, the underground cinema stuff really gets the point across. Good work. Doctor Sunshine talk 00:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Bold text[edit]
Ooper edited your text and put it in bold (See this revision: [1])
WhisperToMe 16:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Argument?[edit]
I wonder if you might want to take a look at this?
A different approach to dispute ...? --Ooperhoofd 14:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
kurosawa[edit]
hello i noticed your edit to Roshomon, please not that every pre-1954 Japanese film is in Public domain[2] --AlexOvShaolin 03:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- wow nevermind, its hard to believe such a ruling was made. --AlexOvShaolin 03:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Pre-Meiji Period: Use of Japanese era name in identifying disastrous events[edit]
Would you consider making a contribution to an exchange of views at either of the following:
As you may know, Wikipedia:WikiProject Disaster management came up with entirely reasonable guidelines for naming articles about earthquakes, fires, typhoons, etc. However, the <<year>><<place> <<event>> format leaves no opportunity for conventional nengō which have been used in Japan since the eighth century (701-1945) -- as in "the Great Fire of Meireki" (1657) or for "the Hōei eruption of Mount Fuji" (1707).
In a purely intellectual sense, I do look forward to discovering how this exchange of views will develop; but I also have an ulterior motive. I hope to learn something about how better to argue in favor of a non-standard exception to conventional, consensus-driven, and ordinarily helpful wiki-standards such as this one. In my view, there does need to be some modest variation in the conventional paradigms for historical terms which have evolved in non-Western cultures -- no less in Wikipedia than elsewhere. I'm persuaded that, at least in the context of Japanese history before the reign of Emperor Meiji (1868-1912), some non-standard variations seem essential; but I'm not sure how best to present my reasoning to those who don't already agree with me. I know these first steps are inevitably awkward; but there you have it.
The newly-created 1703 Genroku earthquake article pushed just the right buttons for me. Obviously, these are questions that I'd been pondering for some time; and this became a convenient opportunity to move forward in a process of building a new kind of evolving consensus. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
kurosawa's film/ PD discussion again[edit]
hello, i was thinking more about this matter/ please see Talk:Akira_Kurosawa#Public_domain --AlexOvShaolin 02:04, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)