User talk:Call me when you get the chance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Call me when you get the chance, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Call me when you get the chance! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Call me when you get the chance. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conven-i-ence trout.[edit]

Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

~~ uℂρЭ 0υĜe 21:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 22:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

missing wednesday text or "C'mon that's today's news"[edit]

I was attempting to add an item on Wed P&E when got conflict alert. Existing content| one item from Wed appeared in Thursday with some extraneous coding. The rest of Wednesday's content had disappeared, including Wed header

-- multiple attempts to fix - whatever you did worked, mine didn't. Thanks. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, RS. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 15:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2.28.13.202 (talk) 01:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I'll try not to do that again, I promise. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 02:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You should give WP:VANDAL and WP:NOTVANDAL a read. Also, when you leave a note — and I give you credit for not just using a vandal template, you should leave a polite note explaining what the editor did wrong. By doing this not only do you educate the other editor you also give yourself a kind of crosscheck. If you can not articulate what they did wrong and why it was, per policy or guideline wrong then you should not be leaving a warning. If you found the edit incorrect for some other reason, explain your concern rather than just jumping on the other editor.
Consider this note I am writing to you, and imagine if instead of explaining I jumped on you in the same way you jumped on the IP editor? Always remember you are addressing your comments to a person. Maybe they actually are a jerk or a vandal but, per policy you must assume, at least at first, that they are not. Also, good job on owning up and apologizing at ANI. That takes character. I wish more people would do that. Jbh Talk 03:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've read 'em. I won't threaten anyone anymore. Those two were pretty long anyway. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 12:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much[edit]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   11:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

"That"[edit]

"That" is a perfectly fine word in many cases and as useless and disruptive an interjection as "um", "er" or "like, you know" in others. If I say "that" is a pointless waste of space, it's the same as saying that "that" is a pointless waste of space. All it adds is another syllable a reader has to pronounce or ignore to get the same idea. Inefficient slop, and you might learn to hate it, too.

Why do you love it for now? InedibleHulk (talk) 00:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is one of my favorite words. Saying something like "He knows he love her" vs. "He knows that he loves her" is like saying "Everything works" vs. "Everything that works". It is useless to you, but not to me. Let that sink in. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 01:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's useful in "Everything works", because that is a declarative sentence, while "Everything that works" is a collective noun. Whole other ball game. But "He knows he loves her" means the exact same thing as "He knows that he loves her". If you're singing that, that might warrant a bonus syllable, but nobody sings the Current Events and nobody expects us to. "I love that ass, honey" vs "I love ass, honey" is another glaring difference (and crucial comma), but when "Fox says Trump says Kim says they're meeting" (or whatever), very few would notice the missing 25% if they weren't reminded it was gone. It's that kind of marriage one should seek with any word; deep meaningful connection about half the time, and an unspoken understanding that you don't need to cling together and finish every damn one of each others' sentences. It stops being cute after a while, trust me. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That is neither my girlfriend nor my wife. In real life, I'm single and have yet to find a girlfriend in person. If you look at my user page, one of my userboxes says that I'm male. That means that I'm a dude. I have a penis, a lot of facial hair, and a male voice. Think about that. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 15:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I knew you were a dude when I called you "brother", brother. But upon closer inspection of your personal userbox, I see you're more than a mere man. You're a man who openly loves movies the way movies could never love him. I daresay the only thing really holding you back from being the next Steven Spielberg is your reluctance to let "that" go when it's not important. That dude knows when to hold 'em and knows when to fold 'em. He's still no Don Bluth and never will be, but I'll bet you're more likely to follow his lead than mine. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not related to you, but one of the links that you typed to me quotes a Kenny Rogers song. I listen to classic hits radio, but I have yet to hear that song on the station. Have you heard it on the radio before? OMG, emphasis on that! Thousands more bytes and this talk page will be a long one. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 19:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We're definitely cousins. Might have to go back a hundred generations to find our grandparents, but they existed as sure as that song (and "That Song") does. The former isn't rock, though, so you may have to wait through centuries of Kenny Loggins and Kenny Shields first. Much easier to tune into TV; it's bound to pop up somewhere. Only another 860,000 bytes before you're bigger than List of Nobel laureates by university affiliation! InedibleHulk (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wait a second, are you....? I think I might pull off a family reunion someday. I'll watch as others spread the world when they read this talk page. They'll know what a good editor I am. There's not much to do right now anyway, but I've got some things to take care of before I die. But I'm 21 but have yet to drink or smoke. I don't intend to do those two horrid things. Remind me what kind of world we live in when the world we really live in is called Earth. You know what, I've got it made. Thanks for this conversation. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 23:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm you from the mirror universe. Started smoking and drinking after accomplishing everything I'd deemed feasible in this world at 12, now I'm sent back to assure you those were both stupid choices. Smoking tobacco and drinking liquor, anyway. Nothing makes a good movie you've already seen a dozen times better than a bowl of weed and a tall glass of water (normal water, not bottled or tap). Also, don't eat anymore birds or their eggs and believe the opposite of the next thing someone tells you about daylight, whether it's positive or negative (claims in that article don't count). There's like, uh, no time to explain that! InedibleHulk (talk) 03:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There are 6,120 Earth seconds in one Earth hour and 42 Earth minutes, but just shy of 5,998 lunar seconds. That's not a complaint, correction or anything like that. Just something to think about. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important Announcement![edit]

I will be joining a day program starting July 30, 2018. The first thirty days (not counting Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays) will last until September 10, 2018. Because I will be at the day program, I won't be editing Wikipedia when I'm there.

I might get a job, and that's gonna be one of the reasons why I won't edit Wikipedia much when I'm at the day program or while I'm employed.

It's been a great pleasure having to edit this wiki whenever I feel like it, and I hope to continue editing this wiki whenever I'm not in the day program or at work. So yeah, I won't be back until I say so. Thank you for a year and about two months of your support.

Oh, and one last thing: Let your mind set you free if you feel like your life is dragging you down.

Again, thank you.

--Chase Baker, also known as Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 22:39, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You Gotta Help Me![edit]

For some weird reason, new edit summaries from me have been disappearing. I'm suspecting that it might be a glitch. As a result, that one website, XTools, I decided to erase my search history of it. Perhaps XTools needs to be fixed in order for my new edit summaries to finally appear. Again, I need all y'all's help. Because Halloween is only five days away and I need to figure out what's been going on with me. I need this taken seriously! Please!

– Chase Baker, also known as Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 03:56, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Call me when you get the chance. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May I[edit]

Know why you reverted a sourced current event about Argentina-Hezbollah? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.141.164.2 (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it didn't land under a particular category. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 03:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't undo user who remove material from their talk pages. as you did at User talk:Andrew939787321. Thay are allowed to do so on English Wikipedia (with very limited exceptions, none of which apply here). Meters (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK Call me when you get the chance 03:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If encounter a user that is edit-warring they may be warned with one of the below as appropriate, you may also offer a warning using your own words. If you file a report at WP:AN/EW it is expected you will provide a diff of a warning previously issued to the user responsible for breaking WP:3RR, or occasionally WP:1RR, the warning does not need to have been issued by you.

{{subst:uw-ew|PAGENAME}}
{{subst:uw-ewsoft|PAGENAME}}
{{subst:uw-3rr|PAGENAME}}

The templates called can be found at Template:uw-ew, Template:uw-ewsoft, and Template:uw-3rr

While we are on this topic, please be advised that while a ping is usually adequate, when you file a report on a user at WP:ANI you are specifically instructed to put an ANI notice on the talk page of the user you are reporting. I have already done that for you but in the future keep in mind the notification requirement at the top of the ANI page is not a suggestion, it's mandatory. Thank you. Spectrum {{UV}} 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 03:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip Call me when you get the chance 03:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I had a very brief peruse of the edit history, and no edit warring stuck out at me, I encourage you to review WP:EDITWAR to better understand the controlling policy. There are however definitely WP:DE issues. I have left them a message, hopefully they will heed it. So I'm going to be around a few more days if you need additional help. However my time may be constrained, so you are probably better off asking any questions you have at the help desk or tea house. Spectrum {{UV}} 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 04:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • FYI I have blocked Andrew939787321 for 36 hrs. Their editing history suggests either massive WP:CIR issues or deliberately disruptive behavior, which their edit on your talk page certainly was. Further they had already been warned, repeatedly, about their editing. Do take note of the advice here and at your ANI report. But while there is some fair criticism of your handling this, your basic grievance was legit. I am guessing your not a regular on the drama boards, which speaks well of your character. Happy editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just got an update: I heard that Andrew939787321 was a sockpuppet account of Nicky jam el cangri; that being said, his block was made indefinite. Call me when you get the chance 15:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw that. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Although I'm not the one who blocked him. NRP blocked him. Call me when you get the chance 17:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Falsely accused?[edit]

I wasn't vandalizing, YOU were involving me in an edit war. Call me when you get the chance 23:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Which of your eidts did i Vandalize? Dispite of warnings you indulged in vandalizing my edits in the current events continuously and engaged in edit war.- Varmapak (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You couldn't wait until 00:00 UTC, so you decided to jump the gun by tacking tomorrow's events onto today's. I didn't allow that to happen. You falsely accused me of vandalizing and dragged me into an edit war with you. That's not right. Call me when you get the chance 23:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Irresistible[edit]

Hey, why are you adding Category:Films not released in theaters due to the COVID-19 pandemic to Irresistible (2020 film). No where in the article does it say that the film was pulled from theatres because of COVID-19. The source used for the statement merely lists changes to theatrical release schedule and no reason. BOVINEBOY2008 17:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And what are you referring to in this edit summary? I think I've only been blocked once before and it was years ago. BOVINEBOY2008 17:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You failed to realize that the film's theatrical release has been cancelled and are edit warring with me right now. I reported you for that. Call me when you get the chance 18:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I only reverted you twice, which is why I brought it here. You still haven't answered my question. How do you know this film was not released in theatres due to COVID-19. I fully realize it was pulled from schedule, I am able to read sources. BOVINEBOY2008 18:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A source should have been cited Call me when you get the chance 18:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The current sources is ""Domestic Release Schedule Changes". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 11 May 2020." which mentions nothing about COVID-19. Do you have another one? BOVINEBOY2008 18:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll think about it Call me when you get the chance 18:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You can't just add categories not supported by sources and then accuse me of bad faith editing. All edits must be supported by sources. This category is not. Unless a source is provided, it shouldn't be in the category. BOVINEBOY2008 18:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there needs to be a source that says the film's theatrical release has been scrapped due to the pandemic. I didn't mean to accuse you of bad faith editing. Call me when you get the chance 18:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Taking this to ANI without an attempt of conversation is clearly not assuming good faith. Please remove the category or add a source. BOVINEBOY2008 18:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I found a source. I'll type it in. Call me when you get the chance 18:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just did. In the future, if you disagree with an edit, bring it to me. I'm happy to talk it through. I'm not always right, but I always operate in good faith. BOVINEBOY2008 18:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Suit yourself Call me when you get the chance 18:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dukes of Hazzard[edit]

Regarding this removal, you included the edit summary "You misplaced it". Where would you suggest as the correct place to include this information? -- Beland (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd put it below "Peep Show" and before the thing that goes "|}". Call me when you get the chance 03:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary report[edit]

@Call me when you get the chance: Please report this topic to WP:DRN. A resolution can be reached without the action of blocking. I am willing to facilitate this argument. If you decide to go down the WP:3RR path, please report to WP:ANI/3RR. HeartGlow (talk) 05:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reported the situation to WP:DRN, but I've been having a hard time trying to report the situation to WP:ANI/3RR. Can you help me out here? Call me when you get the chance 06:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing[edit]

I like to say I'm sorry for not properly sourcing some of the changes I do to the List of films impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic I just don't know how to properly source, other then linking to the website in the edit summary, but I do get my sources from Box Office Mojo and some other places, since I work at a movie theater knowing this information is critical to me, so I want to apologize for me not sourcing my info, and Thank you for your workTVWolf (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. You're welcome. Stay safe. Call me when you get the chance 19:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events[edit]

Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events as you have done edits on Portal:Current events. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to inform you about that and hope you join. Elijahandskip (talk) 16:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attention![edit]

Your attention is needed at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_25#Template:Film_date as there are other people who have responded to your !vote and require your response. 212.219.58.164 (talk) 10:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility[edit]

Please do not use semi-colons purely for decoration to introduce bold styling: this is why we have '''. See MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, Portal:Current events/Edit instructions, and MOS:DLIST. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 09:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop contradicting these guidelines. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hating on the semicolon. I like the semicolon just fine. You do not understand. Call me when you get the chance 21:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Call me when you get the chance, No, you do not understand. Quit inserting incorrect semantics into pages. You have not shown any comprehension of MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, MOS:DLIST, or the edit instructions page and its talk. Stop. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I take it, you HATE the semicolon. You need to stop being angry with me over some, uh, minor edit. And what do you mean "incorrect semantics"? And what do you mean "MOS:PSEUDOHEAD" or "MOS:DLIST"? I know of the edit instructions page, but please. Take a deep breath and perhaps Dispute resolution could sort things out, hopefully. Call me when you get the chance 21:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Call me when you get the chance, What I mean is that you introduce incorrect semantics by starting a definition list with a semi-colon and then not having the rest of the list which is delimited with colons. Instead, you start a definition list and then follow it with an unordered/bulleted list. That is incorrect semantics. You need to read the pages that I linked to understand and you obviously haven't. Actually read these guidelines and follow them. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Both of those things were too long for me to read. I now understand. Call me when you get the chance 21:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Call me when you get the chance, Is this a joke? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I know of pseudo-headings and of definitions. I'm serious. This is no joke at all. Call me when you get the chance 21:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant Admin's noticeboard thread[edit]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Call_me_when_you_get_the_chance_keeps_on_inserting_improper_semantics_into_pages,_refuses_to_even_read_documentation. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply in said thread. Call me when you get the chance 21:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advice and warning about edit warring[edit]

I noticed the edit warring at List of English-language films with previous foreign-language film versions. You have also broken the 3 revert rule, as your edits are not exempted under the specific exemptions listed further down the edit warring page. Consider this a warning and advice about edit warring. Edit warring is not right even if you think you are in the right. If you think you will get involved in an edit war over something not exempted, then report it or let other users revert. There is no deadline on Wikipedia, so leaving something unreverted for a while is not an inherently bad thing. However, certain things, like BLP violations are important to remove, which is why they are listed as exemptions to the 3 revert rule. Please take this warning seriously. Also ensure that you keep cool in discussions, focusing on the content and not the contributor. If you have questions, ask. I have this page watchlisted for the time being. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Call me when you get the chance (talk) 23:38, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Singer TV show[edit]

Hello, could you help me to revert the edits which special:Contributions/117.1.244.233 made and report that IP user? See Special:diff/1000451093 and Special:diff/1000451203. Season 8 is definitely the final season of "Singer" TV show, no mistakes. IP user persistently give vandalised editing. 161.81.218.206 (talk) 13:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boney M – More Gold[edit]

Thanks for reverting these IP edits. Just to let you know I've put in a request for page protection to try and put off the IP editor, who has a looooong history of adding unsourced content to Boney M album articles, and many others... I see you have a request immediately above about the very same editor, and perhaps you should be aware of this page if you aren't already – it's widely considered by other editors to be the same person. Richard3120 (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know who he is, Richard. I just can't stand him. Call me when you get the chance (talk) 01:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Current Events Barnstar[edit]

The Current Events Barnstar
Thank you for creating the Portal:Current events pages! Also, you are welcome to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events. Elijahandskip (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talking to the Moon[edit]

Of course, he is not Brazilian but Warner Music Brazil (label) released the song as a single only in Brazil. Elektra and Atlantic never released the song as a single anywhere else, unless you have sources to back it up it stays the away it is, so please stop reverting correct edits. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see your point. Call me when you get the chance (talk) 20:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi,

I saw your Wiki User Page and, in an moment of curiousity, I decided to reach out to you. Let's chat.

Your introduction was of interest - I am always keen to touch base with new people.

I hope you will take the time to reach back and make contact.

Thewolfde (talk) 03:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]