User talk:NaomiAmethyst/Archives/2019/October
(Redirected from User talk:Cobi/Archives/2019/October)
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Administrators' newsletter – October 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories
.
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
Technical news
- As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
Arbitration
- The 2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place October 4th to 10th.
- The arbitration case regarding Fram was closed. While there will be a local RfC
focus[ing] on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future
, there is currently a global community consultation on partial and temporary office actions in response to the incident. It will be open until October 30th.
Miscellaneous
- The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Good afternoon
Hello. There is a topic that needs your bot
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Iran
Thanks you. Hamidmsi (talk) 12:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hi Hamidmsi and welcome to Wikipedia!
- You can't request that ClueBot NG runs on a specific page I'm afraid. It works on the probability that an edit is vandalism, you can find out more about how it judges edits here. I've had a look at that page and, although I'm no expert on the subject, I can't see any obvious vandalism.
- ClueBot NG does catch a lot of vandalism but inevitably it will miss some. This is why you can also revert edits. You can find out more about reverting edits here.
- Finally, unless it's urgent, you should use ClueBot NG's talk page to ask questions about the bot. I hope this helps you!-- 5 albert square (talk) 16:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)