User talk:Vgbyp

US homicide rate

According to the accepted source, the most recent US homicide rate is 5.00 and not 4.96.

Tmp100380 (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

The source you are citing displays "5", not "5.00". "5.00" implies precision to the second decimal place, whereas the "5" being displayed is the result of rounding. The source also lets downloading the XLS table with the unrounded numbers; it shows "4.96" precisely. Vgbyp (talk) 13:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from Mootros

Hi, Vgbyp. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mootros (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Binary options trading platform

Hi Vgbyp

Why you keep deleting my links? I have added glossary which is valuable information for binary options traders. please reconsider.

regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoavind (talk • contribs) 14:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Because it is a spam link to low quality resource, which adds nothing useful to the article. Vgbyp (talk) 14:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Vgbyp I disagree with you. it adds definitions of phrases in the binary option field, please visit the url. thanks.

I have visited it. The article's subject is well-defined in the article itself with sufficient number of references used. Your link has nothing to do with it. And please move this discussion to article's Talk page. Vgbyp (talk) 15:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Envid, Thank you for your insights into my work on the Birkirkara page. I understand your concerns and fully agree with reasons you specified. I was in the process of inserting the relevant citations when I got stuck with some data that needed to be revised and I did not insert the relevant citations in the meantime. I plan to work on the page over this weekend. Please do visit it again in a couple of days time and kindly advise me if there is anything that might need tweaking. I'm always happy to learn. Thank you Angie Balzan (talk) 08:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

I added the reference to major brands of binary platforms because I believe this is valuable information and not as a promotion to those sites. I fail to see why you choose to delete my reference. I’m asking you to please reconsider. If you think the information is incorrect (meaning those are not the major brands) I would be more than happy to know why. Chgoe (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

For starters, please move this discussion to the Talk page of the discussed article. Vgbyp (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Moved. Chgoe (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

I believe this is valuable information to Wikipedia readers. I re-added it. I disagree with you, sorry. please give an appropriate reason for the deletion. 24Option's writers (talk) 12:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Apologies

I didn't look carefullly enough and only saw the link and the reference to the link in the changes on the point and figure page. My bad. Sposer (talk) 13:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

russian causes of death on rosstat

how do you access it? someone told me you know. looked on the site and couldn't find it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flapski (talk • contribs) 03:45, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

This is the latest, I believe: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/2012/demo/edn12-12.htm Vgbyp (talk) 18:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Vgbyp tht's great and just what i was after. thanks.

i just thought of something though (if you dont mind pal), is there a page before that that links directly to it and where they update it every year? this would save me from asking you in the future. have they got previous years' data on there which i'm also interested in? i couldn't find any of this on the English translate which is my first language but i might have missed it, i'm thinking all this you can only access in russian which i have a poor understanding of. sorry to be a pain. Flapski (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

I just had the link for 2011 (http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/2011/demo/edn12-11.htm) and googled its text ("ЕСТЕСТВЕННОЕ ДВИЖЕНИЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ В РАЗРЕЗЕ СУБЪЕКТОВ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ") to find the 2012 page. Vgbyp (talk) 17:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

thank you Vgbyp i got bogged down with other stuff and forgot. thats excellent it works a treat ive got a whole bunch of them from the last few years. kudos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flapski (talk • contribs) 17:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

I Disagree to you with crime in China

I just want to let you know that I undid one of your recent edits, because the outdate of the crime rate. 0.8 is the new crime rate in china after 2 years and who said japans crime rate was 0.3 freaknomics said it is 1.17 with is 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CALGARY ROCKS (talk • contribs) 17:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

The whole table uses UNODC homicide statistics report as a source. If you have some important changes supported by authoritative sources, you should provide a reference for each rate, which deviates from the one in the UNODC report.Vgbyp (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

HFT NOT A TEST so put the code back, and then if you want, a sandbox exists for you to play

1952 Porsche 356 K/9-1 Prototype

gracias, i dont sign, i am too cool for wikipedia

now put the edits back in to HFT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.10.199.189 (talk) 19:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

eToro Reference

Hi Envid,

could you explain to me why the Reference i added was deleted again.The source has a high reputation and publishes real reviews about brokers (good or bad).Link 21 to forexchef is just another affiliate projekt trying to earn money with fake reviews about brokers.I find it a bit odd that this kind of site is beeing published and the source i mentioned is not.I would appreciate if you could have a look at the reference and reconsider your decision.

Regards

shrader — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashrader (talk • contribs) 15:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

What is your relation to broker-bewertungen.de? The reference does not support the claims it is cited for. The fact that another reference is spammy does not mean that a second spammy reference should be added. The whole article is poorly sourced and will be rewritten soon. Vgbyp (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

I dont have any relation to the site at all.In my opionion the broker should be viewed from any angle instead of just the brokers sites itself and spammy affiliate projects.The reference does that by publishing useful informations and user reviews which help people including me to get usefull informations before investing real money. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:51:A81D:D831:152A:82B2:E900:F246 (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

O Visa

Hey Vgbyp! Was looking at the DOS link you added on the O visa page, I don't see any information about how O visa applicants (unlike other temporary visas) do not need to show binding ties to a residence outside the U.S. Was wondering if maybe you saw something different? Weirtz7 (talk) 18:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey Vgbyp! I don't agree with your changes on the O visa page. The first one you linked to an article that does not contain any information about the specific copy that you added the reference too. The second, you took away useful information to the user about what the O visa is commonly called. Have you taken a look at other Visa wiki pages? They link to similar content. Or even the O-1 page I linked to? It's a very thorough piece of content. The DOS link you added as a reference to the following text was removed because the page mentions nothing about O visa applicants not having to prove binding ties to residence, unlike other visas: "Unlike many other temporary employment visas, the applicant need not demonstrate proof of binding ties to a residence outside the United States which the applicant has no intention of abandoning." Weirtz7 (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey Vgbyp! Where exactly do you see that an applicant need not demonstrate proof of binding ties to a residence outside the United States from your notation? It seems like you are not keeping relevant information in the article. (No longer a case according to https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/employment/temporary.html) --- I undid your change because one of the main advantages of the O-1 Visa is that a holder does not have to prove binding ties to residence outside the U.S., this does not apply to O-2 Visas however. I updated the copy to reflect the facts. Weirtz7 (talk) 15:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey Vgbyp! I don't know why you keep saying self-promotion as a reason--- I don't own a legal website. Why do you keep removing relevant information?

IQ Option

Hi Vgbyp!

Could you please help me remove the official website (iqoption.com) from the blacklist? I have no idea why was it included, it must have been a mistake. Since it's blacklisted, I cannot make references to it to make the article more informative. Rrusl u (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps, it was blacklisted for a reason. Anyway, linking to the primary sources for reference is not a good idea.Vgbyp (talk) 10:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vgbyp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry

I forgot this is an encyclopedia, not an investigative reporting site lol. My bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottwindcrest (talk • contribs) 19:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 10:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vgbyp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Important Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

All articles related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, are placed under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume an edit is related and so is a revert.
Any uninvolved administrator may, at his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please discuss on talk page.

I've added a section on the talk page for 'List of countries by intentional homicide rate'. Let's discuss the matter rather than edit war. Thanks Anastrophe (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vgbyp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Old Friend!

You may or may not know me but I need your assistance. You have reviewed one of my article on Wikipedia in the past (Hack Forums) and if you had the time to review another one, that would be great! I have already submitted it for review but with the amount of pending submissions it will take forever.  Avalerion  V  (let's talk?) 11:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft article: Draft:Nulled

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Vgbyp,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Vgbyp,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Vgbyp,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Augustin Lazar

Why you deleting this.... As a magistrate, he coordinated complex investigations in the field of organized crime and corruption, as well as the repatriation of stolen historical treasures belonging to the national cultural heritage. In his capacity as Prosecutor General of the Prosecutor's Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, he promoted the justice reform in the spirit of European values, lead the Romanian Public Ministry in key projects destined to fight corruption, conflict of interests, money laundering offenses, environmental offenses and others; he developed international judicial cooperation, actively participating in the Forum of Prosecutors General of the European Union into the establishment process of the European Prosecutor's Office. As a representative of Romania, he organized and participated at international conferences on combating corruption, business related offenses, crimes against the cultural heritage and so on. During the events organized in Berlin by the Academy for Cultural Diplomacy, between 6 and 10 November 2019, on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the Former Prosecutor General of Romania, Mr. Augustin Lazăr, held the conference with the title "If you Want Peace, prepare Justice - Confidence in the Judiciary, an Essential Value of the Rule of Law”. (https://www.facebook.com/125959932672/posts/10157729711002673 |title=During the events organized in Berlin by the Academy for Cultural Diplomacy, between 6 and 10 November 2019, on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the Former Prosecutor General of Romania, Mr. Augustin Lazăr, held the conference with the title "If you Want Peace, prepare Justice - Confidence in the Judiciary, an Essential Value of the Rule of Law”)

List of countries by intentional homicide rate Discussion

Hi Envid! I don't understand what parameters were used in the current list, since most of sources are outdaded or divergent from UNODC latest report, how we can use Non-UNODC sources for some countries, and not for others? Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hesteriana (talk • contribs) 02:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

@Hesteriana: The list - the main table titled "Intentional homicide victims per 100,000 inhabitants. From UNODC." - uses only UNODC data. If some data there diverges from the UNODC report, please update it. We shuldn't use any non-UNODC sources there, not for any country. However, we can use any other reliable sources in the "Country subdivisions" section below the main table. Thank you! Vgbyp (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Digital Currency reference in a Currency article

(I have moved this discussion to Talk:Currency as it is relevant there.) Vgbyp (talk) 10:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Relative Strength Index External Link

Hello Vgbyp, You revoked my addition of an external link on the Relative Strength Index page. I believe the statistical part on all types of RSI entries on the page I added are worth being shown, especially that there aren't such data elsewhere on the net. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naimelhajj (talk • contribs) 08:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

It isn't an WP:RS, and it also falls under WP:COI. Please make sure you are following Wikipedia rules when editing articles. Vgbyp (talk) 16:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Undid revision 965594418 by Vgbyp (talk)

Thanks for taking the time to take the subject of EB-5 Regional Centers seriously, Envid.

I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that the entry you deleted was in no way promotional ... it described a notable and unique occurrence in the establishment of EB-5 Regional Center designations, just as the two previous RC entries before it regarding RC designations in Rockland, IL and the District of Colombia. This is not promoting an investment opportunity, as the NatureAll Regional center has since explored options of moving to Texas and sought to establish a new entity and new Regional Center designation in another state, requiring that the process of applying with USCIS be started again from the beginning. The entry is also not advertising a service, nor is it recommending any business or promoting any product.

Accordingly I have, respectfully, reversed your redaction ... I do, however, as a new member editor on the Wikipedia platform, appreciate your contribution to the important subject of foreign investment in the US economy through the EB-5 investment program. Please let me know if you have any questions for me!

-Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNetOutcome (talk • contribs) 12:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

I am reverting it because it is unencyclopedic and promotional in nature. Vgbyp (talk) 16:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

With all due respect, sir ... you would have to erase the two other entries regarding specific regional center designations. This seems to have gotten personal for you. I will be re-reverting it back into existence as part of the official record kept here on Wikipedia, as it has as much, if not more, encyclopedic value than the previous two passages regarding regional center designations, and is not promoting any product, service, or investment opportunity. If you can point out my error where I am accidentally advocating for a product, service, or investment opportunity, I'll gladly agree with you. Otherwise, I urge you to enlist the opinion of an impartial third party, and be sure to mention my point about the previous two regional center designations, specifically mentioning by name not only the corporate entity serving as the EB-5 investment vehicle, but also principal agents as well as investment amounts. If these aren't promotional in nature, as you've mentioned, then how is the entry about the now defunct NatureAll RC? Thank you Envid! Please have a blessed 4th of July holiday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNetOutcome (talk • contribs) 23:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

It doesn't cite any reliable sources and is pure spam. Vgbyp (talk) 09:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia, your entries and responses are as well ... spamming: "unsolicited or undesired electronic messages" ... as long as we ignore, just as one would need to to consider my entry as being "spam," the complete absence of any kind of commercial advertising in your responses. Think about what you're doing and why you're doing it. I suspect you feel it's your personal duty to fight for the virtue of Wikipedia. In your quest to do so, however, you've become part of the problem. I can do this every day, Vgbyp. Keep it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNetOutcome (talk • contribs) 12:55, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

MetaTrader 4

Hello, Can you tell me why did you regard the paragraph about MT4 and MT5 comparison as a "refspam"? Also, please explain what is "refspam" and what is not. --Zizovic (talk) 13:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

BLP Noticeboard: Proposal for political nominations

Would just like to say that it was very gracious of you to strike through your comments there; many others would just repeat their views without caring. That's very admirable conduct.

Sdrqaz (talk) 21:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Financial markets content project

Hello,

My name is Tijana and I am a team leader of Wikinvesting.com project. Along with five of my colleagues and friends who are investment and trading enthusiasts, I have started the Wikinvesting which is based on MediaWiki platform.

Wikinvesting is a non-profit, game-changing movement which aims to round up all those individuals who believe that unbiased financial market information and knowledge should be extensively available to everyone. And this is also how I got to you :) Namely, I was searching for information I needed on financial markets and I have noticed that there isn’t a lot of "useful" information available on Wikipedia (to my surprise). In addition to that, the information available through sites such as Investopedia or Investing is tightly controlled by the business owners and hence easily manipulated. Simply, traders like me could not trust such sources in planning the investment and trading strategy...

So, what we want to create is a base where active or aspiring traders, content writers, investors, and generally financial enthusiasts will share their knowledge and experience, discuss investment opportunities, analyze news etc., all for the purpose of wikinvesting becoming the biggest financial knowledge “open source” base. I am not sure if you are familiar with the recent case of GameStop where gaming enthusiasts gather around the GameStop via reddit forum and prevented the hedge funds from sinking it down. They were basically our inspiration to starting this project.

I would love to share more information about this project with you and also discuss future potential opportunities, hence if you are interested, please let me know so we can continue this on our slack channel.

Cheers,

TijanaRistic (talk) 13:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Sloviansk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Israel Securities Authority Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Israel Securities Authority Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flag and pennant patterns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Improving the Tezos article

Hi Vgbyp, I work for Tezos and have written up some suggested changes to improve the article's accuracy. As you have been active in discussions related to cryptocurrencies, I thought you may want to weigh in on an ongoing discussion on the Tezos Talk page. I welcome any feedback you have and would appreciate assistance implementing the changes due to my COI. Thanks very much, Marko at Tezos (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Bitcoin article - Privacy and Fungibility section - Original Research allegation

The change in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bitcoin&diff=1130056766&oldid=1130010872

You reverted my change, saying it appeared to be original research. I'd like to discuss what falls under that category for you. There is a reference to a Senate bill, by Senator Warren. I suppose that part you would agree is not OR. Perhaps your issue is with the part I added following that, that it is the users of the network, rather than the network itself breaking fungibility. You may have have a problem with the next sentence as well, that users can use a CoinJoin transaction to regain fungibility. Are those last two sentences the problem? Thanks.

Haxwell (talk)

Actually all three sentences are problematic in my opinion. The first one would require a secondary source that supports the said bill does indeed ban anonymized digital assets. The second one (about 'users not network') needs a source for itself. And the third one has two problems with its source: although the source excellently explains how CoinJoin works, it doesn't serve as a good non-OR support for the actual claim of the sentence, and it is also a wiki-website, which, being a user-generated content, shouldn't be used as a reliable source. Vgbyp (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

- The first one would require a secondary source that supports the said bill does indeed ban anonymized digital assets. That is literally what the bill itself says. Section 3.d of the Bill reads: "TREASURY REGULATIONS.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall promulgate a rule that prohibits financial institutions from ... (2) handling, using, or transacting business with digital assets that have been anonymized by the technologies described in paragraph (1)." As is mentioned in the lead up to this sentence in the article, chain analysis is how financial institutions will comply with the law, and how courts will determine if the law has been broken.

I think that passes verifiability, and the Bill itself was published by Congress. It does not need a second supporting source; it is the source! And because the statement is relevant, verifiable, and the source is reliable, it is not Original Research.

That said, I do need to word things better here, and you were right to delete it as is.. Overall it is not up to snuff.. I will go back to the drawing board on this one. But its not OR even now :p

Haxwell (talk) 06:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

The cited piece talks about financial institutions and anonymization by some specifically described technologies. Maybe that's exactly what was written in your edit to the article, but it's hard to judge - that's why a secondary source that would support the claim would be much more preferable here. No offense, but considering there is no urgency to add this information, it is best to get it right than to add it fast but poorly, decreasing the section's overall quality. Vgbyp (talk) 10:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

BIS article use of £stg

I'm putting this here rather than in talk:pound sterling because it is incidental to your main point (and my reply). Because Ireland had an Irish pound until it joined the euro, it was common practice in Ireland (and, seemingly, still is in banking circles) to disambiguate the £ sign. "For avoidance of doubt". Legacy systems etc. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about acknowledging something. Wikipedia is supposed to follow, not lead. It is not up to you to declare whether a code or abbreviation is "historical" or "obsolete" but actual use. We both provided sources, you cannot simply WP:ASSERT with no evidence backing your case. Find proofs or acknowledge you were wrong. OurangMedan (talk) 22:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

NETELLER

What were your reasons for reverting the edits I made? These were based on recent articles to ensure that all information was up to date Clapton3819 (talk) 13:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

For Neteller capitalization, please see the Manual of Style on Trademarks. As for the content, it looks like you've removed recently added content and restored some of the content from the older versions of the article. Vgbyp (talk) 07:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

NETELLER capitalisation is a brand stylisation. For the content, I updated the content to the most accurate version based on current sources Clapton3819 (talk) 10:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Did you read the section on Trademarks in the Wikipedia's Manual of Style that I've linked to? Vgbyp (talk) 10:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Neteller-Logo-2001.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neteller-Logo-2001.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 23:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)