User talk:GrindtXX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rogue Article, or not?[edit]

Do you have any views on Gatton, Surrey whether it is worthy of its own article?
Consider: we already have Gatton (UK Parliament constituency) for when it was a famed Rotten Borough.

London wiki[edit]

If you wish to make use of this wiki feel free (OR etc allowed). Jackiespeel (talk)

Virgo Fidelis[edit]

Faridah was a pupil whilst I was at school. We were in the same year

INCUNABLE[edit]

returning sentence with source. in addition in "procopius waldvogel " there are many more sources with research done on this finding Mzc1954 (talk) 17:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Croyland Chronicle[edit]

Hello, can you take a look at your revert on Croyland Chronicle. The time spans now overlap with 2 ending in 1486. Keith D (talk) 21:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith D:, yes, that is correct. You can check this in Riley's 1854 edition (links at foot of page). The second continuation (which Riley calls the third, but that's a separate issue) spans pp. 453–510 and the years 1459–86, ending with the marriage of Henry VII (January 1486); the third continuation (which Riley calls the fourth), by a different author, spans pp. 511–33 and starts with Henry's coronation (October 1485), but mainly deals with events in 1486. The article does need more work, and some of the complexities explained, but those ranges are sound. GrindtXX (talk) 01:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the explanation. The article needs clarifying as it looks wrong as it stands. Keith D (talk) 12:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About revert[edit]

Hey, just noticed you reverted me on Old Palace School. You said "no need to shout". That's the official name on the register. For context, it's not always caps on the website. — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 21:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kunal Nayyar[edit]

Hi, I've added some more discussion to your post about Nayyar's nationality, since it seems to be a rather contentious topic and it doesn't seem like there was much discussion happened after you made your post. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vi et armis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's peace.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the {{Nowrap}} template threw me off. Steel1943 (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Wales Feathers[edit]

Just to finish the edit summary (which saved too early): (B) It's WP:PRIMARY at best and hardly high quality regardless of the Self-pub (C) it's entirely unnecessary in the lead (D) I'm not going to spend time unpicking what's ok and what's not in a defective edit (D) Per WP:BRD take it to talk if you disagree. Thanks. DeCausa (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexithymia image[edit]

Just saw this article go past on my watchlist again and I'm still a bit puzzled by the infobox image. Any thoughts on my response at Talk:Alexithymia#Infobox image, where I missed your initial ping? Belbury (talk) 12:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]