User talk:Hfrancis123

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Hfrancis123. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added 17:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Seagull123 Φ 17:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hfitm-power, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Hfitm-power! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike | Talk 20:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hfrancis123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Hfrancis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

removal of company name from username

Decline reason:

That username is unavailable as it has already been registered. Additionally, you have not addressed your inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 15:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hfrancis123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Hfrancis123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Previous username suggest is already in use. Also how do i address/ see the inappropriate edits made?

Accept reason:

Procedural accept following rename. Another admin will review the substantive unblock request, above. Just Chilling (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed from 'Hfitm-power' to Hfrancis123'. Just Chilling (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hfrancis123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked as i don't believe i was intentionally promoting the individual in the article. I have had a read through the article and understand there are some parts of the professional career section which need to be edited. This is my first time editing Wiki as you can see, so would appreciate if I was given the benefit of the doubt, on this occasion. Also this is not the only page i am intending to write about such as clean fuel, hydrogen energy systems etc @ Orange Mike

Decline reason:

See my message below, to which you have not responded. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have looked at the two draft pages you created, and my first thought is that if you were not intending to promote, but nevertheless managed to write so much that looks like marketing copy or a CV, then you lack the ability to see the nature of your own writing, so that you are unlikely to be able to edit in the neutral way needed. You say that "there are some parts of the professional career section which need to be edited", but it goes way beyond "some parts of the professional career section". However, rather than declining your unblock request immediately, I am posting this message to encourage you to indicate what you think needs changing. If you can show an understanding of what the problem is then your unblock request may stand a better chance of success. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:30, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]